1995
DOI: 10.13182/nt95-a15851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualification of a Passive Catalytic Module for Hydrogen Mitigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical models describing PAR operation within comprehensive computational codes are typically based on empirical equations which correlate the relevant parameters, e.g., hydrogen concentration and total pressure, with the hydrogen recombination rate (AECL [1], FRA-ANP [5], NIS [6]). Regardless of their advantages in terms of computational efforts, their applicability is limited to boundary conditions similar to the underlying validation database.…”
Section: Parupm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical models describing PAR operation within comprehensive computational codes are typically based on empirical equations which correlate the relevant parameters, e.g., hydrogen concentration and total pressure, with the hydrogen recombination rate (AECL [1], FRA-ANP [5], NIS [6]). Regardless of their advantages in terms of computational efforts, their applicability is limited to boundary conditions similar to the underlying validation database.…”
Section: Parupm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large scale vented containment test facility (Canada/AECL) [36] Battelle model containment (Germany/Battelle) [37] KALI (CEA) [38] H2PAR (CEA) [39] (13) Hydrogen combustion (i) Autoignition temperaturez…”
Section: Managing Analytical Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAR device models for predictive safety analysis within integral computational codes have been traditionally based on empirical expressions correlating the main parameters: AECL (Bachellerie, 2002), FRA-ANP (Mohaved, 1994) and (Carcassi, 1997), NIS (Fischer, 1995), (Carcassi, 1997) and (Sher, 1997).…”
Section: Physical Model Of a Parallel-plate Recombinermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By reasons of consistency with the variable database in the code, the numerical has been transformed into real variable precision, hence by using the SGETRF, SGETRI, SGEMV, etc… libraries from LAPack. Model coupling has been performed with minimum modifications, in order to keep the current abilities of MELCOR, in such way that variable input needed for the proposed model (gas composition in terms of mole fractions, temperature and pressure) are the same as the currently implemented model by Fischer (Gauntt, 2000) and (Fischer, 1995). Specific parameters needed for the model proposed (number of plates, L, b, h, e, ρ plate , c p ) are introduced via MELCOR input file with the inclusion of a new flag IPROPT < 0.…”
Section: Implementation Into the Melcor Codementioning
confidence: 99%