2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41372-020-0749-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative analysis of latent safety threats uncovered by in situ simulation-based operations testing before moving into a single-family-room neonatal intensive care unit

Abstract: Objectives We aimed to identify: (a) latent safety threats (LSTs) in a new neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) through simulation-based pre-occupancy operations testing, and (b) LSTs that remained unresolved 1-year post-occupancy. Study design In this qualitative study, 111 healthcare professionals participated in patient care simulations and debriefings in a new NICU. Debriefing transcripts were inductively analyzed to characterize LSTs. Unresolved LSTs were identified 1 year after NICU occupancy. Results The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our quality improvement project focused significantly on what Nickson et al (2021) describe as the output stage and our threat mitigation practice practices appeared similar to their described practice of assigning ownership of the identified to the operational decision maker/site leadership, and using focused follow up to ensure resolution. This appeared aligned with the emerging literature (Dadiz et al, 2020;Petrosoniak et al, 2019). Without diligent attention to this phase, we do not feel we would have been able to achieve the lasting change in mitigating threats to patient safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our quality improvement project focused significantly on what Nickson et al (2021) describe as the output stage and our threat mitigation practice practices appeared similar to their described practice of assigning ownership of the identified to the operational decision maker/site leadership, and using focused follow up to ensure resolution. This appeared aligned with the emerging literature (Dadiz et al, 2020;Petrosoniak et al, 2019). Without diligent attention to this phase, we do not feel we would have been able to achieve the lasting change in mitigating threats to patient safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…We noted that on 12-month follow-up, 10 threats remained but required ongoing management to alleviate. Previous work identifies that remaining latent safety threats after this time period are not unexpected (Dadiz, et al 2020). However, at two-year follow-up, eight of the remaining 10 threats were mitigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This methodology has yet to gain broad traction in the healthcare arena, as these tools are often deemed too complex, time-consuming, and/or expensive. Various components of simulation have been applied successfully to patient safety, 4 operational readiness, 41 multidisciplinary teamwork, 42 and skills training in critical scenarios such as adult trauma, 43 pediatric emergency departments, 44 and rapid responses. 45 FMEA has been used in the evaluation of radiation and chemotherapy implementation, 10 and communication during transplantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveys suggest that staff perceptions reflected concerns about the early detection of medical crises and adequate patient care in the SFR, suggesting an issue with patient safety in the SFR model 15 . Studies have also alluded to other safety concerns, including communication deficits, missing equipment and supplies, suboptimal staff response times to emergency situations and staffing issues when transitioning from open bays to SFR 16 . Nevertheless, in these studies, the overall benefits outweighed the challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%