Qualitative analysis of medical student reflections on the implicit association test

Abstract

Introduction Health professions educators use the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to raise awareness of implicit bias in learners, often engendering strong emotional reactions. Once an emotional reaction ensues, the gap between learner reaction and strategy identification remains relatively underexplored. To better understand how learners may identify bias mitigation strategies, the authors explored perspectives of medical students during the clinical portion of their training to the experience of taking the IAT, and the resulting feedback. Methods Medical students in Bronx, NY, USA, participated in one 90‐minute session on implicit bias. The focus of analysis for this study is the post‐session narrative assignment inviting them to take the race‐based IAT and describe both their reaction to and the implications of their IAT results on their future work as physicians. The authors analysed 180 randomly selected de‐identified essays completed from 2013 to 2019 using an approach informed by constructivist grounded theory methodology. Results Medical students with clinical experience respond to the IAT through a continuum that includes their reactions to the IAT, acceptance of bias along with a struggle for strategy identification, and identification of a range of strategies to mitigate the impact of bias on clinical care. Results from the IAT invoked deep emotional reactions in students, and facilitated a questioning of previous assumptions, leading to paradigm shifts. An unexpected contrast to these deep and meaningful reflections was that students rarely chose to identify a strategy, and those that did provided strategies that were less nuanced. Conclusion Despite accepting implicit bias in themselves and desiring to provide unbiased care, students struggled to identify bias mitigation strategies, a crucial prerequisite to skill development. Educators should endeavour to expand instruction to bridge the chasm between students’ acceptance of bias and skill development in management of bias to improve the outcomes of their clinical encounters.

Reflection on near-peer shadowing program: impact on operating room student’s perception of their future profession

“…To understand the experiences of students in this program, we used qualitative analysis on students’ written reflections. Reflection is widely applied in qualitative studies [ 23 , 24 ]. The academic literature on reflection has revealed that it can help us understand participants' internal dialogues and analyze their thought processes.…”

Recommendations for Faculty Development in Addressing Implicit Bias in Clinical Encounters and Clinical Learning Environments

“…Despite having had at least two instructional sessions on implicit bias, being not only aware but accepting of their implicit biases, they could not identify strategies to manage the potential impact of their implicit biases. 54 Given these limitations, we propose sustainable longitudinal skill development that harnesses the good intentions of most physicians. Interventions targeting implicit bias must go beyond awareness to providing instruction on strategies for bias management and opportunities for skill development and practice.…”

Eliminating Explicit and Implicit Biases in Health Care: Evidence and Research Needs

“…The IAT and other measures ( 32 ) of implicit bias, stigma, and attitudes toward groups of persons were used among subjects to ( a ) demonstrate the existence of participant implicit biases, ( b ) act as a springboard to create cognitive dissonance for oral and/or written reflection and to practice bias management skills, and ( c ) evaluate interventions. Gonzalez et al ( 37 ) found that using the IAT without priming on its results and without a follow-up debriefing led some subjects (22%) to question the validity of the measure and the existence of implicit biases, and therefore advised judicious use of the IAT and trained facilitators. Subjects who accepted the results of the IAT were not able to develop management strategies for those biases without dedicated instruction.…”