2017
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2017.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative analysis of the minimum flow rate of a cone-jet of a very polar liquid

Abstract: Electrostatic atomization of a liquid of finite electrical conductivity in the so-called cone-jet regime relies on the electric shear stresses that appear in a region of the liquid surface when a meniscus of the liquid is subjected to an intense electric field. An order of magnitude analysis is used to describe the flow induced by these stresses, which drive the liquid of the meniscus into a jet that issues from the tip of the meniscus and breaks into droplets at some distance from it. When the dielectric cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to existing theories (Fernández de la Mora & Loscertales 1994; Gañán-Calvo et al. 1997, 2013; Higuera 2017), the dimensionless minimum flow rate for either liquid is not constant but increases with the electrical conductivity. In terms of the Reynolds number, the experimental data are well fitted by the power laws for tributyl phosphate and for propylene carbonate.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Contrary to existing theories (Fernández de la Mora & Loscertales 1994; Gañán-Calvo et al. 1997, 2013; Higuera 2017), the dimensionless minimum flow rate for either liquid is not constant but increases with the electrical conductivity. In terms of the Reynolds number, the experimental data are well fitted by the power laws for tributyl phosphate and for propylene carbonate.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…A possible explanation of the apparent disagreement with Gañán-Calvo et al. (2013) and Higuera (2017) is that the values investigated may not be large enough for the inviscid limits (1.3) and (1.5) to apply. Furthermore, the Reynolds number for these solutions (and probably for most electrosprayable solutions) is never too large or too small, which limits the accuracy that can be expected from asymptotic estimations for very large or very small Reynolds numbers.…”
Section: Experimental Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations