2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative and quantitative change in the kinematics of learning a non-dominant overarm throw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Angular deviation was defined in the transverse plane, with angles of 0° representing minimal rotation. Reductions in 67 , a motor strategy which could be used to reduce action uncertainty 44 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Angular deviation was defined in the transverse plane, with angles of 0° representing minimal rotation. Reductions in 67 , a motor strategy which could be used to reduce action uncertainty 44 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angular deviation was defined in the transverse plane, with angles of 0° representing minimal rotation. Reductions in maximum hand displacement and/or swing ROM values would signal greater ‘fixing’ of movement degrees of freedom 67 , a motor strategy which could be used to reduce action uncertainty 44 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants in this study, in addition, placed the supporting hand static and to the side so as not to interfere with ball release (Gómez, et al, 2017). Therefore, movement stability and postural control are essential features for shooting accuracy (Palmer, et al, 2018). However, some players may shoot without stability as a strategy to capitalise on the potential energy created both by the elbow extensor muscles and pre-stretching the wrist flexors, as the present work reported (Figures 2 and 3 below).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…As less core activation takes place during seating in comparison to standing (Saeterbakken & Fimland, 2012), one position could have offered better stabilisation for force generation than the other (Bampouras et al, 2017). Performance during the seated position was less familiar and consequently could have augmented the inter-limb difference (Palmer et al, 2018), even if it is unlikely that the sequential muscle activity would have been affected (Hirashima et al, 2002). Whichever the reason, our results support the development of sport-specific assessments that can account for the complex nature of the sport (Bampouras & Marrin, 2009).…”
Section: Discussion and Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%