2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22207789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative and Quantitative Detection of Food Adulteration Using a Smart E-Nose

Abstract: Food adulteration is the most serious problem found in the food industry as it harms people’s healths and undermines their beliefs. The present study is focused on designing and developing a smart electronic nose (SE-Nose) for the qualitative and quantitative fast-track detection of food adulteration. The SE-Nose methodology is comprised of a dataset, sample slicing window protocol, normalization, pattern recognition, and output blocks. The dataset pork adulteration in beef is used to validate the SE-Nose meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the electronic nose was able to differentiate between different proportions of pork forequarter, chicken breast, and chicken skin in beef brisket, with accuracies of 87.82%, 99.04%, and 98.57%, respectively [86]. The recognition accuracy of fake beef rolls adulterated with different proportions of pork and duck can reach more than 95% [87], and that of beef samples adulterated with different proportions of pork can be as accurate as 97.4% to 99.99% [88][89][90]. It can be seen that, although beef adulteration means are complex and diverse, the electronic nose can still be used on the beef according to the unique volatile substances emitted by the different meats to distinguish them effectively to detect the adulteration of different types and different quantities of other meats to provide technical support.…”
Section: Application Of Electronic Nose In Meat Adulteration Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the electronic nose was able to differentiate between different proportions of pork forequarter, chicken breast, and chicken skin in beef brisket, with accuracies of 87.82%, 99.04%, and 98.57%, respectively [86]. The recognition accuracy of fake beef rolls adulterated with different proportions of pork and duck can reach more than 95% [87], and that of beef samples adulterated with different proportions of pork can be as accurate as 97.4% to 99.99% [88][89][90]. It can be seen that, although beef adulteration means are complex and diverse, the electronic nose can still be used on the beef according to the unique volatile substances emitted by the different meats to distinguish them effectively to detect the adulteration of different types and different quantities of other meats to provide technical support.…”
Section: Application Of Electronic Nose In Meat Adulteration Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deep learning model implemented in the study achieved a classification accuracy of 90%, while accuracies of up to 98.74% and 89.49% were also achievable using the random forest and MLP feed-forward neural network classifiers, respectively. Elsewhere, the work undertaken by Pulluri and Kumar [111] involved the development of a smart electronic nose (SE-Nose) designed to rapidly detect and measure food adulteration, particularly in recognizing the presence of pork in beef. The methodology employed classification models to do qualitative analysis of adulteration and regression models to conduct quantitative analysis.…”
Section: Ai and ML In The Detection Of Food Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maintain consistency in the lengths of the data segments, it is necessary to upsample the sliced data to match the original sequence length. Methods similar to WS have been applied in related studies of E-nose systems [22,31].…”
Section: Data Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%