2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.01.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of coprological and serological techniques for the diagnosis of fasciolosis in cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
106
1
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
106
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations were reported from Switzerland, where infected livers were detected only in two-thirds of seropositive animals at abattoir inspection (Rapsch et al, 2006). Charlier et al (2008) showed that only one third of F. hepatica infected livers was detected by standard meat inspection cuts, that Fig. 2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Similar observations were reported from Switzerland, where infected livers were detected only in two-thirds of seropositive animals at abattoir inspection (Rapsch et al, 2006). Charlier et al (2008) showed that only one third of F. hepatica infected livers was detected by standard meat inspection cuts, that Fig. 2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A number of diagnostic tools have been developed for single or simultaneous detection/discrimination of F. hepatica and F. gigantica, including morphological (using shape and size and morphometric features), immunodiagnostic (using monoclonal antibodies or copro-antigen (extracted from eggs in feces) and metacercarial/Fasciola-specific antigens for ELISA) and DNA-related loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), PCR (single or multiplex), restriction enzymatic, and sequencing methods (2,3,5,11,12,13,35). All the diagnostic methods developed so far have contributed to fast, accurate, and specific detection of Fasciola spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, various diagnostic techniques for the identification and discrimination of Fasciola spp. have been developed, including the traditional detection of eggs in feces directly or after Kato-Katz based sedimentation (19,43), the morphological examination of adults (38), the lateral flow immunoassay for serodiagnosis (28), and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (indirect ELISA) (12,13,32,36).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ELISA was selected in the current study for evaluation of the diagnostic potency of the isolated glycoproteins based on its high sensitivity and possibility of processing many serum samples simultaneously (Cornelissen et al 2001;Charlier et al 2008). In the present study, it was concluded that FII glycoprotein could detect experimental F. gigantica infection in rabbits as early as one week post infection with high significance than FI and crude extract.…”
Section: Serine (Ser)mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The early diagnosis of fasciolosis during prepatent period using antibody detection tests is an essential method for arresting its negative impact on productivity and preventing economic losses (Sanchez-Andrade et al 2000;Dixit et al 2004;Kumar et al 2008). ELISA-based antibody detection systems using different protein antigens are excellent for the early diagnosis of fasciolosis Espinoza et al 2007;Mezo et al 2007;Charlier et al 2008;Kumar et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%