2019
DOI: 10.3390/atmos10010017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative and Quantitative Investigation of Multiple Large Eddy Simulation Aspects for Pollutant Dispersion in Street Canyons Using OpenFOAM

Abstract: Air pollution is probably the single largest environment risk to health and urban streets are the localized, relevant hotspots. Numerous studies reviewed the state-of-the-art models, proposed best-practice guidelines and explored, using various software, how different approaches (e.g., Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS), large eddy simulations (LES)) inter-compare. Open source tools are continuously attracting interest but lack of similar, extensive and comprehensive investigations. At the same time, their… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it is problematic for the comparison with the three available experimental data sets. This was also pointed in our previous work [64] and occurs for x/W = 0.50, while the comparisons are excellent for x/W = 0.25 and 0.75 (not presented here). Nevertheless, all the tested SGS models and even the denser mesh (180 cells per height, instead of 120) did not solve the problem, but all the other validation metrics (i.e., LES_IQ v , FAC2, NMSE) were within the acceptable limits [64,69,70].…”
Section: Simulation Set-upsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, it is problematic for the comparison with the three available experimental data sets. This was also pointed in our previous work [64] and occurs for x/W = 0.50, while the comparisons are excellent for x/W = 0.25 and 0.75 (not presented here). Nevertheless, all the tested SGS models and even the denser mesh (180 cells per height, instead of 120) did not solve the problem, but all the other validation metrics (i.e., LES_IQ v , FAC2, NMSE) were within the acceptable limits [64,69,70].…”
Section: Simulation Set-upsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Finally, the standard deviation of the vertical velocity σ W /U ref is in good agreement with the numerical and experimental data in Figure 2d. From these comparisons and previous [64], the agreement between the current LES and the experimental and numerical data is judged as satisfactory. The comparison for the standard deviation of the horizontal velocity σU/Uref in Figure 2c is also excellent between U5AR100 and the experimental work from [66] for the whole range of z/H, while is good for the height of the building with the high resolution LES by Kikumoto and Ooka [68].…”
Section: Simulation Set-upmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the increasing use of CFD techniques, it is crucial to assess the performance of turbulence models adopted to estimate ventilation and pollutant dispersion in urban areas. Evaluations of turbulence models and physical parameters influencing CFD simulations have been conducted by Chatzimichailidis et al [13] for 2D street-canyon flows, by Tominaga and Stathopoulos [14] for three-dimensional (3D) street-canyon flows, by Dai et al [15] through flow and dispersion inside building arrays, and by Yoshie et al [16] through a simulation of flow and dispersion around a high-rise building under a weakly unstable condition. Chew et al [17] evaluated the performance of RANS and LES models in the simulations of reduced-scale and full-scale 2D street-canyon flows with windward wall heating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%