Abstract:We consider a non-convex variational problem (P) and the corresponding singular perturbed problem (P ε ). The qualitative behavior of stable critical points of (P ε ) depending on ε and a lower order term is discussed and we prove compactness of a sequence of stable critical points as ε 0. Moreover we show whether this limit is the global minimizer of (P). Furthermore uniform convergence is considered as well as the convergence rate depending on ε.
“…Alternatively, (1.3) occurs as a quasi-steady, phase field model in the theory of solidification with ϑ representing temperature [1,2]. One-dimensional phase transition modelling can also give rise to higher order non-convex variational problems [10,12], see [9] for a general discussion. However we confine ourselves to studying generalizations of (1.2) and the weak* limits in L ∞ per of its minimizers as → 0 and two questions arise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, (1.6) may have a unique minimizer. This happens if the set of zeros of ϑ is discrete, a case that was thoroughly investigated in [1,2] (see also [10] for generalizations and further discussion). Alternatively, (1.6) may have an infinite set of minimizers, including Young measure solutions, as happens when ϑ in (1.1) vanishes on some interval.…”
For a smooth W : (0, ∞) × R d → R and a family of L-periodic W 1,2-functions ϑ : R → R d with ϑ ϑ, the basic problem is to understand the weak* limit as → 0 of L-periodic minimizers of L
“…Alternatively, (1.3) occurs as a quasi-steady, phase field model in the theory of solidification with ϑ representing temperature [1,2]. One-dimensional phase transition modelling can also give rise to higher order non-convex variational problems [10,12], see [9] for a general discussion. However we confine ourselves to studying generalizations of (1.2) and the weak* limits in L ∞ per of its minimizers as → 0 and two questions arise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, (1.6) may have a unique minimizer. This happens if the set of zeros of ϑ is discrete, a case that was thoroughly investigated in [1,2] (see also [10] for generalizations and further discussion). Alternatively, (1.6) may have an infinite set of minimizers, including Young measure solutions, as happens when ϑ in (1.1) vanishes on some interval.…”
For a smooth W : (0, ∞) × R d → R and a family of L-periodic W 1,2-functions ϑ : R → R d with ϑ ϑ, the basic problem is to understand the weak* limit as → 0 of L-periodic minimizers of L
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.