1985
DOI: 10.13182/fst85-a39958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative Comparisons of Fusion Reactor Materials for Waste Handling and Disposal

Abstract: The activation of five structural materials and seven coolant/breeder/multiplier materials in a common reference neutron environment was calculated with the FORIG activation code. The reference environment was the neutron flux and spectrum at the first wall of the mirror advanced reactor study (MARS) reactor. Qualitative comparison of these activated materials were made with respect to worker protection requirements for gamma radiation in handling the materials and with respect to their classifications for nea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radioactive waste disposal of these materials has been studied. 1 The results indicate that PCA and the copper alloys would not qualify for near-surface burial. On the other hand, Mod HT-9 and the vanadium alloy will qualify for Class C near-surface burial.…”
Section: Additional Limits On Materials Selectionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The radioactive waste disposal of these materials has been studied. 1 The results indicate that PCA and the copper alloys would not qualify for near-surface burial. On the other hand, Mod HT-9 and the vanadium alloy will qualify for Class C near-surface burial.…”
Section: Additional Limits On Materials Selectionmentioning
confidence: 97%