Qualitative Content Analysis of Coworkers’ Safety Reports of Unprofessional Behavior by Physicians and Advanced Practice Professionals

Abstract

Objectives:The aims of the study were to develop a valid and reliable taxonomy of coworker reports of alleged unprofessional behavior by physicians and advanced practice professionals and determine the prevalence of reports describing particular types of unprofessional conduct. Methods:We conducted qualitative content analysis of coworker reports of alleged unprofessional behavior by physicians and advanced practice professionals to create a standardized taxonomy. We conducted a focus group of experts in medical professionalism to assess the taxonomy's face validity. We randomly selected 120 reports (20%) of the 590 total reports submitted through the medical center's safety event reporting system between June 2015 and September 2016 to measure interrater reliability of taxonomy codes and estimate the prevalence of reports describing particular types of conduct. Results:The initial taxonomy contained 22 codes organized into the following four domains: competent medical care, clear and respectful communication, integrity, and responsibility. All 10 experts agreed that the four domains reflected essential elements of medical professionalism. Interrater reliabilities for all codes and domains had a κ value greater than the 0.60 threshold for good reliability. Most reports (60%, 95% confidence interval = 51%-69%) described disrespectful or offensive communication. Nine codes had a prevalence of less than 1% and were folded into their respective domains resulting in a final taxonomy composed of 13 codes. Conclusions:The final taxonomy represents a useful tool with demonstrated validity and reliability, opening the door for reliable analysis and systems to promote accountability and behavior change. Given the safety implications of unprofessional behavior, understanding the typology of coworker observations of unprofessional behavior may inform organization strategies to address this threat to patient safety.

Gotcha! Using Patient Safety Event Reports to Report People Rather Than Problems

“…The above vignette highlights that many perceived instances of unprofessional behavior between members of the health care team fall along a spectrum and may be more accurately categorized as incivility, microaggressions, or-as in this case-miscommunication. 4,5 The scenario also illustrates how safety event reporting can insidiously produce a culture of blame, as opposed to a culture of safety. In this Perspective, we describe what we believe is a growing problem in GME: the unintended consequences of using safety event reporting systems to report professionalism concerns.…”

Supporting the pursuit of professionalism during a crisis

“…The source of data for leadership observations was a series of focus groups conducted with leaders for organiations that participate in two large national collaboratives including 55 health systems and 185 hospitals and practice sites that address professionalism among healthcare professionals, coordinated by a single centre 21 23. The centre reviews patient complaints and coworker observations to help participating organiations identity and address clinicians with unprofessional behaviour 11–13 24.…”

Digital Health Testbeds in Sweden: An exploratory study

“… 48 Extracting the lists themes further strengthened the analyses to provide detailed information. Nevertheless, the analysis may have been prone to the researchers’ bias (subjective) to interpretation, and inherently reductive, 49 focusing on words or phrases, especially in the case of complex texts.…”