Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach

Smith, Joanna; Firth, Jill

doi:10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.52.c8284

Cited by 901 publications

(698 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

691

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The systematic qualitative data analysis was guided by the framework approach [25,26]. This structured method supports thorough data analysis through the use of several codification grids, which allow summarization in every step.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health Literacy Skills in Relatives? Speech: A Canadian Case-Study

Clure

Rochette²

2013

J Community Med Health Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health Literacy Skills in Relatives? Speech: A Canadian Case-Study

Clure

Rochette²

2013

J Community Med Health Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…One author (N.L.) charted the arising themes and representative quotes, addressing why a category should or not should not be a research priority, using the Framework approach 6. A second author reviewed this charting and provided additional suggestions (L.H.).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Setting research priorities in tobacco control: a stakeholder engagement project

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and AimsThe Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group (TAG) conducts systematic reviews of the evidence for tobacco cessation and prevention interventions. In 2016 TAG conducted a priority‐setting, stakeholder engagement project to identify where further research is needed in the areas of tobacco control and smoking cessation.DesignThe project comprised two surveys and a workshop. A range of stakeholders participated, including members of the public (smokers and ex‐smokers), clinicians, researchers, research funders, health‐care commissioners and public health organizations. The first survey phase identified unanswered research questions in the field of tobacco control. The second phase asked participants to rank these, with overall rankings calculated by combining scores across participants. The workshop allowed attendees to discuss prioritization of topics and questions in more depth. Workshop discussions were transcribed and analysed thematically, and a final voting activity at the close of the workshop allowed participants to choose topics to prioritize and to de‐prioritize.FindingsA total of 304 stakeholders (researchers, health professionals, smokers and ex‐smokers, guideline developers, research funders and policymakers, representing 28 countries) identified 183 unanswered research questions. These were categorized into 15 research categories. A total of 175 participants prioritized categories and questions in the second survey phase, with ‘electronic cigarettes’; ‘addressing inequalities’; and ‘mental health and other substance abuse’ prioritized as the top three categories. Forty‐three stakeholders attended the workshop and discussed reasons for and against category prioritization. Prioritized research categories largely mirrored those in the survey stage, although ‘treatment delivery’ also emerged as a key category. Five cross‐cutting themes emerged: efficacy; relative efficacy; cost effectiveness; addressing inequalities; and different types of evidence.ConclusionsThere are many unanswered questions in the field of tobacco control. Stakeholders highlighted electronic cigarettes, addressing inequalities and mental health and other substance abuse as key areas for further research, and efficacy, relative efficacy, cost‐effectiveness and use of non‐randomized studies as important themes cutting across research areas. Future prioritization work would benefit from targeting non‐US and non‐UK stakeholders explicitly and from examining where priorities may differ based on stakeholder group.

show abstract

“…Another term that you may come across is Framework Analysis [1,2], but rather than an implied philosophical approach, this is effectively a set of practical steps to carry out qualitative data analysis in a reproducible fashion. This data analysis method was devised to inform rapid development of social policy.…”

Section: Grounded Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Analyse qualitative data

Jamieson

2016

Education for Primary Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach

Cited by 901 publications

References 9 publications

Health Literacy Skills in Relatives? Speech: A Canadian Case-Study

Health Literacy Skills in Relatives? Speech: A Canadian Case-Study

Setting research priorities in tobacco control: a stakeholder engagement project

Analyse qualitative data

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About