Qualitative Delphi approach of advanced algae biofuels

Abstract

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. Purpose -Currently, experimental and theoretical work is being performed to ensure that biofuels from microalgae become a reality. However, there is a considerable number of discussions concerning in which processes should be focussed efforts of research and development. The purpose of this paper is to provide decision support not only to help build guidelines of research to be undertaken, but also to contribute to the design of more adequate policy and funding instruments. The key objective of this study is to determine the prospects of employing microalgae into the production of biofuels within a time scale extending to 2030. Design/methodology/approach -The Delphi method is a qualitative research aiming to support strategic future-oriented action, such as policy making in the areas of science and technology. It is especially appropriate in judgment and long-range forecasting (20-30 years) situations, when expert opinions are often the only source of information available, due to a lack of appropriate historical, economic or technical data. Findings -The Delphi method proved to be a successful research method when expert opinions are the main source of information available, due to a lack of appropriate historical, economic or technical data and the outcomes provided a clear outline of the main issues of microalgae biofuels' market at present and in the future.Research limitations/implications -The outcomes might not represent the majority of the microalgae experts' opinion due to the sample size. Originality/value -The work presented in this paper is especially original. According to the authors' knowledge, this is the first qualitative Delphi study related to algae biofuels.

Enablers of sustainable industrial ecosystem: framework and future research directions

“…Content (Stubbs and Cocklin, 2008), grounded theory, case study (Apeaning and Thollander, 2013;Murty et al, 2006;Zhu et al, 2007), bibliometric study (Meerow and Newell, 2015) Qualitative (Ribeiro and Pereira da Silva, 2015), quantitative (Kytzia, 2009;Sureeyatanapas et al, 2015) Source: Gaur and Kumar (2018) The firms that are rich in resources find it easy to make changes toward sustainability. DiMaggio and Powell (1983) defined three basic types of the institutional theory, namely, coercive, mimetic and normative pressure.…”

Data-driven fleet management using MOORA: a perspective of risk management

“…Mehnen et al (2013) discussed appropriateness of the Delphi method for obtaining information about governance. Ribeiro and Pereira da Silva (2015) demonstrated the Delphi method to determine the prospects of using microalgae into the production of biofuels within a time scale extending up to 2030. Chun and Lee (2017) developed a service evaluation index for internet addiction in South Korea based on the Delphi method.…”

Policy-adaptation for a smarter and more sustainable EU electricity distribution industry: a foresight analysis

“…: a statement on Business Model Innovation -StrategyInnovation-Strategy, operations, and organisational adaptation, for which aggregated expert's rating on the firstround survey is below 70% on any of the data analysis scales, would be included in the second-round survey). The use of a percentage threshold for inter-round statement selection is a commonly used technique in Policy Delphi applications (Loë et al 2016;Ribeiro and da Silva 2015). Additionally, at the end of each round a customised report was provided to each participating expert, in which the individual assessment was presented as well as the aggregate distribution from the assessments of all the participating experts.…”