2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10164-020-00650-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative description of the submission and agonistic behavior of the Spix’s Macaw (Cyanopsitta spixii, Spix 1824), with special reference to the displacement displays

Abstract: The Spix’s Macaw (Cyanopsitta spixii) represents one of the four avian taxa, in which its global population is entirely captively managed. The species was declared “extinct in the wild” after several attempts failed to rediscover any remaining individuals in the wild since 2000. As an integral part of the ongoing ex situ conservation efforts, a long-term ethological study was conducted at the ACTP facility to investigate the behavioral repertoire of the largest subpopulation of this species in captivity. In th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within Archosauria, extant crocodylians practice extensive intrasexual aggression, resulting in dramatic facial injuries (Cott 1961;Gorzula 1978), whereas birds rely primarily on visual/vocal intersexual display (Butcher and Rohwer 1989), resulting in fewer physical injuries. However, this dichotomy is simplified, as these behaviors are not mutually exclusive; crocodylians do engage in vocal/ visual displays before, or instead of, combat (Garrick and Lang 1977;Garrick et al 1978;Vliet 1989;Thorbjarnarson and Hernández 1993;Wang et al 2007;Dinets 2013), and many bird species do engage in intraspecific combat (Payne 1984;Hansen 1986;Simmons and Mendelsohn 1993;Marcuk et al 2020) that can cause injury/death (Müller et al 2007;Hof and Hazlett 2012;Hunt et al 2021). Further, displays in both groups can be directed at, or by, both sexes, although the meanings may differ between males and females (i.e., the same signal may represent a threat to members of the same sex and an advertisement to members of the opposite sex), making teasing out intra-versus intersexual selection more difficult (Payne 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within Archosauria, extant crocodylians practice extensive intrasexual aggression, resulting in dramatic facial injuries (Cott 1961;Gorzula 1978), whereas birds rely primarily on visual/vocal intersexual display (Butcher and Rohwer 1989), resulting in fewer physical injuries. However, this dichotomy is simplified, as these behaviors are not mutually exclusive; crocodylians do engage in vocal/ visual displays before, or instead of, combat (Garrick and Lang 1977;Garrick et al 1978;Vliet 1989;Thorbjarnarson and Hernández 1993;Wang et al 2007;Dinets 2013), and many bird species do engage in intraspecific combat (Payne 1984;Hansen 1986;Simmons and Mendelsohn 1993;Marcuk et al 2020) that can cause injury/death (Müller et al 2007;Hof and Hazlett 2012;Hunt et al 2021). Further, displays in both groups can be directed at, or by, both sexes, although the meanings may differ between males and females (i.e., the same signal may represent a threat to members of the same sex and an advertisement to members of the opposite sex), making teasing out intra-versus intersexual selection more difficult (Payne 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…African Pied Starlings have been observed contracting and dilating their pupils during food exchange interactions, with the donor widening their pale irises and the recipient narrowing them (Craig 2022). Similarly, contraction of the pupil to accentuate the iris is common in parrots, where it is called "eye-blazing" or "eye-pinning", and this behavior is associated with excited states including social dominance interactions and courtship displays (Hardy 1963, Smith 1975, Serpell 1982, 1989Courtney 1997a, b;Marcuk et al 2020, Moore et al 2022). Similar behaviors have been observed in other families and may prove to be widespread across lighteyed birds (McIlhenny 1937, Hardy 1974, Craig and Hulley 2004.…”
Section: Social Signalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vladislav Marcuk et al (2020). Qualitative description of the submission and agonistic behavior of the Spix's Macaw (Cyanopsitta spixii, Spix 1824) (Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 253-270).…”
Section: Editor's Choice Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%