1967
DOI: 10.2307/1909110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative Economics and Morishima Matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude this section with the definition of Morishima and anti-Morishima matrices, as it appears in [5]: Let B be an anti-Morishima matrix. We say that B is of type i if all its diagonal entries are nonpositive, and the minimum among the orders of −B 11 and −B 22 (as they appear in definition 1) is equal to i.…”
Section: Known Results and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We conclude this section with the definition of Morishima and anti-Morishima matrices, as it appears in [5]: Let B be an anti-Morishima matrix. We say that B is of type i if all its diagonal entries are nonpositive, and the minimum among the orders of −B 11 and −B 22 (as they appear in definition 1) is equal to i.…”
Section: Known Results and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What about k = 3? By Theorem 5.3, all extremal matrices in H SN (5,3) have six anti-Morishima 2-by-2 Schur complements of type 0. Moreover, similarly to our main result, this structure has a beautiful visualization through polyhedra.…”
Section: ) Be a Nonsingular Matrix Let B Be A Principal Submatrix Ofmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It will be noted that if A is a stable matrix, then A is nonsingular; we shall first summarize certain theorems concerning the class of stable qualitative matrices that have "signed inverses." THEOREM 5.9 (see [22] Proof The sufficiency of (i) is obvious while the sufficiency of (ii) follows from a similar result in [15]. To prove the necessity, assume that aiajkaki < 0 for three distinct indices i, j, k. Then the cofactor Aij of the element a in A contains two terms of opposite sign, aji x diagonal elements excluding aii and ajj and COROLLARY (see [13]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The following generalizes a result obtained by McKenzie for Perron-Frobenius matrices. THEOREM 5.7 (see [22] (ii) Ibhlh2l --Ibh2h3l…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%