Qualitative evaluation of a pilot educational intervention to increase primary care HIV-testing

Abstract

Background UK guidelines recommend a ‘routine offer of HIV testing’ in primary care where HIV diagnosed prevalence exceeds 2 in 1000. However, current primary care HIV testing rates are low. Efforts to increase primary care HIV testing are needed. To examine how an educational intervention to increase HIV testing in general practice was experienced by healthcare professionals (HCPs) and to understand the perceived impacts on HIV testing. Method Qualitative interviews with general practitioners (GPs) and nurses 3-months after receiving an educational intervention developed from an adapted version of the Medical Foundation for HIV and Sexual Health (MEDFASH) HIV Testing In Practice (TIPs) online educational tool which included training on HIV associated clinical indicator conditions, why, who, and how to test. The intervention was delivered in 19 high-HIV prevalence general practices in Bristol. 27 semi-structured interviews were conducted across 13 practices with 16 GPs, 10 nurses and the sexual health clinician who delivered the intervention. Transcripts were analysed thematically informed by Normalisation Process Theory. Results HCPs welcomed the opportunity to update their HIV knowledge through a tailored, interactive session. Post-training, HCPs reported increased awareness of HIV indicator conditions, confidence to offer HIV tests and consideration of HIV tests. Continued testing barriers include perceived lack of opportunity. Conclusions This qualitative study found that HIV education is perceived as valuable in relation to perceived awareness, confidence, and consideration of HIV testing. However, repetition and support from other strategies are needed to encourage HCPs to offer HIV tests. Future interventions should consider using behaviour change theory to develop a complex intervention that addresses not only HCP capability to offer an HIV test, but also issues of opportunity and motivation.

Efficacy of HIV interventions among factory workers in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

“…An educational intervention had a signi cant effect on improving HIV/AIDS knowledge, changing HIV attitudes and reducing the proportion of workers with extra-partners, and could also change premarital and paid sexual behavior when combined with a community intervention. The combination effect of an educational intervention and a community intervention is better than single intervention [53,54].…”

Creating an online educational intervention to improve knowledge about systematic reviews among healthcare workers: mixed-methods pilot study

“…Multiple studies have employed qualitative methodology to seek opinions about educational interventions from HCWs [33][34][35][36]. Such studies enable authors to test the intervention on a smaller sample before analyzing the efficacy of an intervention in the larger, adequately powered quantitative study.…”

Hiv Testing in Secondary Care: A Multicentre Longitudinal Mixed Methods Electronic Survey of Non-Hiv Specialist Hospital Physicians in South-East Scotland and Northern England

“…20,31,32 However, 'one-off' training sessions on HIV testing are likely to require further interventions such as designated HIV testing liaison health advisors 33 and/or computer-based prompting to provide lasting benefi ts. 34,35 As undiagnosed individuals may present to a variety of settings, improving local screening processes requires education and engagement of health and social care workers throughout primary and secondary care facilities. 36 It is important that these factors are also considered when developing educational strategies.…”