Qualitative Evaluation of Cancer Survivors’ Experiences of Metacognitive Therapy: A New Perspective on Psychotherapy in Cancer Care

Abstract

Background Preliminary evidence suggests that metacognitive therapy (MCT), a brief, process-focused psychological intervention, alleviates distress in cancer survivors. In a longitudinal qualitative study nested in an open trial of MCT for cancer survivors, we explored how patients understood, experienced and applied MCT. Methods Patients received six MCT sessions. Consenting patients provided semi-structured interviews post-intervention ( n = 19), and at 3- and 6-months follow-up ( n = 14 and 10 respectively). Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Analysis followed a constant comparison approach. Results Participants felt “overwhelmed” by worry before starting MCT and doubted that such brief therapy could help. Their accounts focused on feeling “challenged” to think differently by the psychologist. Those completing therapy were enthusiastic about it. They described having learned that thoughts are “only thoughts,” that feelings of worry or sadness are a normal part of life, and that they were in control of whether and how they engaged with thoughts. Consequently, most described a sense of freedom to live free from worry. A minority described being unable to apply MCT to certain thoughts. Two patients who withdrew before completing MCT did not describe having learned what MCT was intended to achieve. Conclusion MCT is an acceptable brief intervention for distressed cancer survivors. Feeling challenged to understand the processes maintaining their distress was central to their enthusiasm for it, irrespective of their presenting difficulties. Implications for Cancer Survivors The complexity of emotional distress in cancer survivors can potentially be addressed using a transdiagnostic model which focuses on the psychological processes which maintain distress.

Predictors of long‐term anxiety and depression in uveal melanoma survivors: A cross‐lagged five‐year analysis

“…Where perceptions of symptoms, functional limitations and recurrence risk are unrealistic, accurate information may help. Where these are objectively problematic, programmes based in coping, metacognitive, mindfulness and acceptance and commitment approaches might help survivors to meet challenges 25 …”

“…If FCR is independent of vulnerability, 14 interventions should aim to address patients' tendencies toward worry and any misperceived vulnerability 15 . However, if worry derives from objective vulnerability, the therapeutic goal becomes helping high‐risk individuals to tolerate it 25 . Studies note the invariance of FCR between groups with different objective risk profiles, 14,26 but relationships between worry and objective risk cannot be directly examined between individuals because objective recurrence risks are difficult to estimate 14 .…”

Cardiac rehabilitation patients experiences and understanding of group metacognitive therapy: a qualitative study

“…To date, two other qualitative studies in different contexts have evaluated patients experiences of MCT when delivered by psychologists. All the patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder who received MCT in one study, 31 and patients diagnosed with cancer and anxiety and depression in the other study 32 were reported to understand MCT in a way that was consistent with the metacognitive model. Patients in these studies described developing new relationships with their thoughts, for example being in control of whether they engaged with thoughts and talked about having more effective ways of coping with problems in the future.…”

The Association Between Maladaptive Metacognitive Beliefs and Emotional Distress in People Living With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

“…There is growing support for the clinical applicability of the S-REF model to emotional distress in physical health conditions (Capobianco et al, 2020)-specifically, for people with cancer (Butow et al, 2015;Cook et al, 2015a,b), diabetes (Purewal and Fisher, 2018), epilepsy (Fisher and Noble, 2017;Fisher et al, 2018), multiple sclerosis (Heffer-Rahn and Fisher, 2018), chronic fatigue syndrome (Maher-Edwards et al, 2011), fibromyalgia (Kollmann et al, 2016), cardiovascular disease (Anderson et al, 2019), and Parkinson's disease (Brown and Fernie, 2015). Preliminary evidence indicates that MCT may be an effective and tolerable intervention for adults with physical health difficulties (Cherry et al, 2019;Fisher et al, 2019b;McPhillips et al, 2019). However, the utility of the S-REF model in understanding emotional distress in people with ALS has not been studied.…”