Qualitative Evaluation of Web-Based Digital Intervention to Prevent and Reduce Excessive Alcohol Use and Harm Among Young People Aged 14-15 Years: A “Think-Aloud” Study

Abstract

Background: In the United Kingdom, despite some downward trends in alcohol use among young people, over one-fifth of young people reported excessive alcohol use in the past month, which is associated with short-and long-term harm to health. Digital interventions to reduce alcohol use, such as websites, among young people present an appealing and cost-effective mode of intervention that can be integrated into the education system. However, relatively few school-based digital alcohol-focused interventions have been developed and evaluated for young people in the United Kingdom. Objective: This study aims to develop a novel web-based intervention, Rethink Alcohol, to prevent and reduce excessive alcohol use and related harm among young people aged between 14 and 15 years, and explore the views of young people, teachers, and youth workers in relation to the content, design, and usability of the intervention. Methods: Intervention development followed the person-based approach, using theories of social norms and social influence. Qualitative "Think-Aloud" interviews, either one-to-one or paired, were conducted while participants perused and worked through the web-based intervention, talking aloud. Participants included 20 young people (12 female, 8 male), 5 youth workers (4 female, 1 male), 3 teachers (2 male, 1 female), and 1 (male) clinical professional, recruited via youth groups and professional networks. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically. Results: The prototype web-based intervention included normative feedback, information, a quiz, interactive activities, and scenarios. On a rating scale of impressions from poor (1) to excellent (5), participants gave an average score of 3.6/5. A total of 5 themes were identified: content, credibility of the website, making the website easy to understand, design and navigation, and suitability for the audience. These themes reflected views that the content was interesting, credible, informative, and embodied a neutral and nonjudgmental tone, but stronger messaging was needed regarding social pressures and short-term risks regarding safety and risk behavior alongside clarity around pathways of risk; credibility and trustworthiness of information were critical features, determined in part, by the professionalism of design and referencing of sources of information provided; and messages should be succinct and come to life through design and interactive features. Conclusions: Together, the data illustrated the importance and challenge of communicating nuanced alcohol-focused public health messages to young people in concise, clear, nonjudgmental, and appealing ways. Young people report interest in clear,

Preferences of young adults on the development of a new digital add-on alcohol intervention for depression treatment: A qualitative study

“…including animated videos and illustrations) seems to make written texts more appealing and helps to emphasize the core message. Similar findings were also found in other (qualitative) studies on digital alcohol interventions designed specifically for adolescents and young adults ( Tinner et al, 2020 ; Crane et al, 2017 ).…”

How do adolescents experience a newly developed Online Single Session Sleep Intervention? A Think-Aloud Study

“…Such interviews differ from cognitive interviews in that while cognitive interviews use targeted interview questions to evaluate participant comprehension during an activity, in think aloud interviews, participants are asked to freely talk out loud about their thoughts while completing a certain task ( Davies, 2018 ). Certain pre-prepared prompts are also provided asking participants to verbalise their thoughts and feelings about the intervention ( Tinner et al, 2020 ). There are two variations in think-aloud protocols; (1) concurrent approach in which participants are shown the materials for the first time during the interview and asked to think aloud as they look at them, and (2) retrospective approach, in which participants work through the materials independently and are then subsequently asked to recall their thoughts at a later time ( Van Den Haak et al, 2003 ).…”