Qualitative evidence synthesis using meta-ethnography to understand the experience of living with osteoarthritis pain

Toyé, Francine; Seers, Kate; Barker, Karen

doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002660

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 168 publications

(349 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We used the methods of mega-ethnography developed by Toye et.al. to synthesise published Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (QES) [19][20][21][22][23] . Mega-ethnography follows the seven stages of meta-ethnography to synthesise research study findings…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We included all identified QES that explored the lived experience of CNCP. A systematic search of bibliographic databases was conducted from inception up until February 2021 using a combination of search terms developed to identify QES [19][20][21][22][23] (Table 1). A single researcher screened titles, and the steering committee screened abstracts and agreed on full text inclusion.…”

Section: Stage 2 (Deciding What Is Relevant)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (QES) bring together published qualitative research and develop ideas that cut across different contexts. There are several QES that explore aspects of the lived experience of chronic pain, and one study that provides a synthesis of QES [19][20][21][22][23] . These QES bring together more than 300 primary qualitative studies into a synthesised form.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Understanding the Lived Experience of Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence Syntheses

Rysewyk

Blomkvisk

Crighton

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Although multiple measures of the causes and consequences of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) are available and can inform pain management, no quantitative summary of these measures can describe the meaning of pain for a patient. The lived experience of pain tends to be a blind spot in pain management. This study aimed to: (1) integrate qualitative research investigating the lived experience of a range of CNCP conditions; (2) establish common qualitative themes in CNCP experience; and (3) evaluate the relevance of our results through a survey questionnaire based on these themes, administered across the United Kingdom. Methods: Six bibliographic databases were searched from inception to February 2021 to identify Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (QES) that investigated the lived experience of CNCP and its impact on everyday life and activities. Themes and trends were derived by thematic qualitative analysis in collaboration with two patient and public involvement representatives through two workshops. The output from these workshops helped inform the creation of twenty survey statements. Results: The research team identified and screened 1,323 titles, and considered 86 abstracts, including 20 in the final review. Eight themes were developed from the study findings: (1) my pain gives rise to negative emotions; (2) changes to my life and to my self; (3) adapting to my new normal; (4) effects of my pain management strategies; (5) hiding and showing my pain; (6) medically explaining my pain; (7) relationships to those around me; and (8) working while in pain. Each theme gave rise to one or two survey questions. The survey was shared with members of the UK pain community over a two-week period in November 2021, and was completed by 1,219 people, largely confirming the above themes. Conclusion/implications: This study provides a validated summary of the lived experience of CNCP. It highlights the adverse nature, complications, and consequences of living with CNCP in the UK, and the multiple shortcomings in the ways in which pain is addressed by others in the UK. Our findings are consistent with published meta-ethnographies on chronic non-malignant musculoskeletal pain, and chronic low-back pain. Despite the underrepresentation of qualitative research in the pain literature compared to quantitative approaches, for understanding the complexity of the lived experience of pain, qualitative research is an essential tool.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Stage 2 (Deciding What Is Relevant)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Understanding the Lived Experience of Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence Syntheses

Rysewyk

Blomkvisk

Crighton

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These methods also enable researchers to study the experiences and perceptions of individuals [ 27 ], and how they make meaning from their experiences [ 29 ]. Focus groups are an increasingly popular approach in medical education and are particularly suitable for exploratory research, promoting the exchange of ideas and perceptions especially in poorly understood or unclear topics [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Promoting group discussion rather than solo interviews can generate insight/ideas and lead to a topic being pursued in greater depth [ 33 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Portuguese Family Physicians’ Perceptions on Pain Management—A Qualitative Study Protocol

Ribeiro¹,

Baptista

Pinto

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pain is an important cause of disability and constitutes the main reason people seek medical care, especially in general practice. Nevertheless, nearly half of adult Europeans with chronic pain receive inadequate pain treatment. Limited knowledge about pain among physicians is recognized as a key barrier to treatment. This is due to the well-known insufficiency in pain education at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. There is a scarcity of research exploring the perceptions of family medicine physicians on these issues. This study aims to evaluate the perceptions of these professionals concerning medical education, as well as their knowledge, skills, and preparedness to manage chronic pain and collect suggestions for improvement. A qualitative exploratory study will be performed using synchronous virtual focus groups and purposive sampling. Eligible participants will be 3rd- and 4th-year family medicine residents and family medicine specialists with at least five years of practice. Sample size and number of focus groups will depend on data saturation. A semi-structured guide will be used. A thematic categorical analysis will be conducted after verbatim transcription of the audiofiles. This protocol has been approved by the Health Ethics Committee.

show abstract

“…This study reports the findings related to the management of osteoarthritis, including the complex decision to undergo joint surgery. Findings related to the experience of living with osteoarthritis are reported separately [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A synthesis of qualitative research to understand the complexity behind treatment decision-making for osteoarthritis

Barker¹,

Toyé²,

Seers³

2023

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Qualitative evidence synthesis using meta-ethnography to understand the experience of living with osteoarthritis pain

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Cited by 4 publications

References 168 publications

Understanding the Lived Experience of Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence Syntheses

Understanding the Lived Experience of Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence Syntheses

Portuguese Family Physicians’ Perceptions on Pain Management—A Qualitative Study Protocol

A synthesis of qualitative research to understand the complexity behind treatment decision-making for osteoarthritis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About