2021
DOI: 10.1037/adb0000746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative examination of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use reasons, evaluations, and patterns among heavy drinking young adults.

Abstract: Use of alcohol and cannabis together so their effects overlap (simultaneous use) is common among college students and associated with numerous negative consequences. The aim of this study was to gain insight into college students' recent simultaneous use events in order to inform future studies (i.e., generate hypotheses, inform measures/assessments of simultaneous use, and identify factors influencing simultaneous use). Qualitative interviews of simultaneous use experiences among heavy drinking college studen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Corroborating prior research on unplanned drinking (Boyle et al, 2021;Stevens, Haikalis, & Merrill, 2021), plans for any substance use (whether it be planned simultaneous or planned single-substance) were motivated by social and enhancement reasons. These findings are especially relevant for unplanned simultaneous use occasions when only alcohol was planned versus occasions when only cannabis was planned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Corroborating prior research on unplanned drinking (Boyle et al, 2021;Stevens, Haikalis, & Merrill, 2021), plans for any substance use (whether it be planned simultaneous or planned single-substance) were motivated by social and enhancement reasons. These findings are especially relevant for unplanned simultaneous use occasions when only alcohol was planned versus occasions when only cannabis was planned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Stevens, Boyle, White, & Jackson (2021) corroborated these relations in a multisite sample of college students and found that drinking to cope or because alcohol was offered was related to unplanned drinking. Boyle et al (2021) expanded upon this finding in a qualitative study of young adult heavy drinkers, showing that many participants did not plan to use cannabis during a drinking event, but did so simply because it was available and offered to them. Other than this qualitative study, motives have not been investigated as predictors of unplanned or planned simultaneous use.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This suggests that simultaneous use in these situations may have been unplanned. Previous qualitative (Boyle et al, 2021) and quantitative (Stevens et al, 2022) research have found availability and offers to be reasons for unplanned simultaneous use. Identifying these situations of unplanned simultaneous use may inform prevention efforts aimed at intervening on unplanned substance use and highlight the importance of providing young adults with refusal skills and/or education about the risks of simultaneous use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this is an important limitation, theories of simultaneous use suggest that using alcohol and cannabis simultaneously enhances single substance effects (i.e., complementarity) or substitutes one substance’s effects with the other (i.e., substitution; Risso et al, 2020; Subbaraman, 2016). This theory has been affirmed both in quantitative work suggesting that alcohol effects are enhanced by simultaneous use (e.g., Lee et al, 2017; Sokolovsky et al, 2020), as well as qualitative work where participants report phrases such as “When you mix [cannabis] with alcohol it makes you feel more relaxed and at the same time you still get the positive like energetic effects of alcohol” and “I [simultaneously used] to bring my high to like the next level” (Boyle et al, 2021). Thus, simultaneous use may have a greater impact on the magnitude of effects than the specific types of effects experienced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%