Qualitative Research Practice.

Boog, B.

doi:10.18352/jsi.39

Cited by 11 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Rescoring outcomes as part of the modified Delphi method facilitates agreement upon core outcomes. [19] The round's 2 results will be reviewed and analyzed by the steering group to consider the need for a further Delphi survey round.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A protocol for developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for stress urinary incontinence

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A protocol for developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for stress urinary incontinence

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This article tries to use qualitative research that emphasizes interpretation of results of regression analysis (Aspers & Corte, 2019), furthermore, using the indepth interview method, where both parties are internally involved and it is physical meetings are important contexts for flexible, interactive and generative interviews (Ritchie, 2003), in which the meaning of language is explored in depth interviews on a topic under study (Jimenez, Hudson, Lima, & Crabtree, 2019). As well as the support of a variety of literature that is proven true through objective confirmation to the resource persons.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does the Government Effectively in Optimizing Open Data? Analysis "Jago Data" in Yogyakarta Municipality

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Open Government Data (OGD) is a database produced by the government that can be freely accessed, used or modified, therefore, this is a support to increase transparency and public participation. This article aims to analyze the effectively optimizing Open Government Data on the Jogja Go Open Data "JAGO DATA" in Yogyakarta Municipality. Furthermore, the methodology of this article uses qualitative research with in-depth interviews and literature, moreover, the variables of this research are focused on legal guidelines and frameworks (crosstab query is 47.5%), the ability of web portal system (crosstab query is 27.5%), and human resource in government and its attitude (crosstab query is 25%), therefore, its data findings were analyzed with NVivo 12 plus software. The result of this article shows that the Yogyakarta city government successfully implemented JAGO DATA to support transparency, accountability, and encourage public participation, moreover, it is has implemented directives regarding Open Data regulation and its innovation designed with a collaborative among regional-level work units (SKPD). Therefore, the JAGO DATA portal is rated as user-friendly with the model used at the information stage and its maturity of a web portal is still in the pre-adoption level.

show abstract

“…The modified Delphi method promotes agreement towards consensus core outcomes (29). This round's results will enable individual outcomes to be classified as shown in table 1 (28).…”

Section: Roundmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Protocol for the Development of Core Outcome Sets in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Research

Doumouchtsis

Rada

Pergialiotis

et al. 2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The high prevalence of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and the women's lifetime risk of requiring surgery, as well as the significant impact of POP on women’s health related quality of life has resulted in a variety of studies on POP interventions. A wide variety of outcomes have been reported across randomized trials evaluating interventions for POP and various outcome measures have been used. Such variation leads to a limited value of research to provide reliable evidence-based data for clinical practice guidance. The development and use of a core outcome set (COS) would help to address these issues ensuring outcomes important to all stakeholders, primarily women with POP. We aim to produce, disseminate and implement a COS for POP. Methods A steering group within the CHORUS, an International Collaboration for Harmonising Outcomes, Research and Standards in Urogynaecology and Women’s Health will guide the development of this COS. Systematic reviews of trials that reported outcomes and outcome measures on interventions for POP will form the basis for the creation of an outcome inventory. Core outcome selection process will be performed using an international, multi-perspective, online Delphi survey. The modified Delphi method encourages stakeholder group agreement towards consensus core outcomes through repeated reflection and rescoring of items. Discussion Dissemination and implementation of the resulting COS within an international context will be promoted. An embedded COS for POP within future studies will most likely be reflected by an increased value of research that provides guidance for clinical practice. The paradigm of the COS development could further inform research priorities in POP treatments, and support clinical guidelines development and better patient care. KEYWORDS: core outcome sets, outcome measures, pelvic organ prolapse, Delphi survey, randomized trials.

show abstract

Qualitative Research Practice.

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

A protocol for developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for stress urinary incontinence

A protocol for developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for stress urinary incontinence

Does the Government Effectively in Optimizing Open Data? Analysis "Jago Data" in Yogyakarta Municipality

A Protocol for the Development of Core Outcome Sets in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About