2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40744-022-00487-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative Research with Patients and Physicians to Assess Content Validity and Meaningful Change on ESSDAI and ESSPRI in Sjögren’s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with methodological guidelines, 34 42 46 this study incorporated the results of both anchor-based and distribution-based methods to propose a revised RD for ESSPRI: completing a trial with an ESSPRI score of ≤3, with an improvement in ESSPRI of ≥1.5 points compared with baseline. This revised RD not only increases the MCII threshold (ie, ≥1.5 points-previously ≥1 point or 15% improvement) and is supported by qualitative data from an interview study, 44 but also incorporates a low/ minimal symptom severity threshold that at ≤3 points was lower than the previously identified PASS of <5. Estimates for meaningful improvement ranged between 0.73 and 4.47 (including both 'minimal' and 'moderatemajor' improvement) and estimates for a cut-off point for 'low/minimal symptom severity' ranged between 3.0 and 4.3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In accordance with methodological guidelines, 34 42 46 this study incorporated the results of both anchor-based and distribution-based methods to propose a revised RD for ESSPRI: completing a trial with an ESSPRI score of ≤3, with an improvement in ESSPRI of ≥1.5 points compared with baseline. This revised RD not only increases the MCII threshold (ie, ≥1.5 points-previously ≥1 point or 15% improvement) and is supported by qualitative data from an interview study, 44 but also incorporates a low/ minimal symptom severity threshold that at ≤3 points was lower than the previously identified PASS of <5. Estimates for meaningful improvement ranged between 0.73 and 4.47 (including both 'minimal' and 'moderatemajor' improvement) and estimates for a cut-off point for 'low/minimal symptom severity' ranged between 3.0 and 4.3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This was further supported by evidence from an interview study with individuals with Sjögren’s whereby a 1-point or 2-point improvement on ESSPRI was considered meaningful. 44 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations