2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1689-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative study on the implementation of professional pharmacy services in Australian community pharmacies using framework analysis

Abstract: BackgroundMultiple studies have explored the implementation process and influences, however it appears there is no study investigating these influences across the stages of implementation. Community pharmacy is attempting to implement professional services (pharmaceutical care and other health services). The use of implementation theory may assist the achievement of widespread provision, support and integration. The objective was to investigate professional service implementation in community pharmacy to conte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
59
0
11

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
59
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…1). We identified 12 CFIR + TDF articles; the final list of included studies comprised five protocols for empirical studies (Gould [22], Prior [23], Manca [24], Graham-Rowe [25], Sales [26]) and seven completed empirical studies (Murphy [27], English [28], Bunger [29], Moullin [30], Newlands [31], Templeton [32], Elouafkaoui [33]).
Fig. 1PRISMA flow diagram
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1). We identified 12 CFIR + TDF articles; the final list of included studies comprised five protocols for empirical studies (Gould [22], Prior [23], Manca [24], Graham-Rowe [25], Sales [26]) and seven completed empirical studies (Murphy [27], English [28], Bunger [29], Moullin [30], Newlands [31], Templeton [32], Elouafkaoui [33]).
Fig. 1PRISMA flow diagram
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two completed studies and two protocols described intervention design and/or implementation plans (Gould [22], Sales [26], Murphy [27], English [28]); one protocol described a comparison of the effectiveness of an intervention relative to standard care (Prior [23]), and two protocols and five completed studies evaluated interventions (Manca [24], Sales [26], Bunger [29], Moullin [30], Newlands [31], Templeton [32], Elouafkaoui [33]). Several of the included studies had multiple objectives (e.g., effectiveness study and concurrent qualitative process evaluation [23, 33]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations