Qualitative synthesis in practice: some pragmatics of meta-ethnography

Abstract

Synthesising qualitative research involves working through difficult practical issues. Drawing upon our collective experience of undertaking three meta-ethnographies, we consider the forms of work -the practical action and practical reasoning -comprising this kind of synthesis and the difference they make to a meta-ethnography. We detail the origins and aims of meta-ethnography, and present a review of existing meta-ethnographies with a specific focus on the methods the authors reported as central to the conduct of meta-ethnography. We consider the implications of these methods and the reason for the presence (and absence) of particular practices in reporting on meta-ethnographies. Drawing upon our own experiences of conducting meta-ethnographies we focus on the methods used in two key practices central to meta-ethnography: 'reading' and 'conceptual innovation'. We conclude by discussing how the meta-ethnographic process requires active reading, a recognition of multiplicity, a realistic approach to conceptual innovation and, importantly, collaborative work.

End-of-life expectations and experiences among nursing home patients and their relatives—A synthesis of qualitative studies

“…We used meta-ethnography as described by Noblit and Hare [15], a strategy including seven steps presented below. This commonly used method is suitable for systematically analyzing and synthesizing qualitative research [16][17][18].…”

Understanding informal carers’ experiences of caring for older people with a hip fracture: a systematic review of qualitative studies

“…Systematic procedures were used for the search strategy, study selection, data extraction and analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) guidelines [25] and following the meta-ethnography method of analysis and synthesis [22,26]. This review was registered and published in PROSPERO database (CRD42015029875).…”

Meta-analysis, complexity, and heterogeneity: a qualitative interview study of researchers’ methodological values and practices

“…Research synthesis—the “engagement between resisting readers and resistant texts,” as Sandelowski evocatively describes it [24]—is no exception to this general point, particularly in the presence of complexity and heterogeneity. Reflexive accounts of the process of meta-ethnography have drawn attention to the tension between the production of synthetic constructs and the recognition of multiplicity [25, 26]; our findings suggest that a similar tension may underlie decisions about syntheses of quantitative evidence.…”