2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2021.104118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative versus quantitative external information for proxy vector autoregressive analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first article to explore whether information about structural shocks should be used to impose NR in an otherwise set-identified SVAR or to construct a proxy for use in a proxy SVAR. Boer and Lütkepohl ( 2021 ) compare the efficiency of proxy SVAR estimators that use only the signs of structural shocks on particular dates against proxies that also use information about the size of the shock (i.e., standard proxies). Based on Monte Carlo simulations, they conclude that the estimator that uses information only about the sign of the shock is nearly as (or, in some cases, more) efficient than the estimator based on the quantitative information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first article to explore whether information about structural shocks should be used to impose NR in an otherwise set-identified SVAR or to construct a proxy for use in a proxy SVAR. Boer and Lütkepohl ( 2021 ) compare the efficiency of proxy SVAR estimators that use only the signs of structural shocks on particular dates against proxies that also use information about the size of the shock (i.e., standard proxies). Based on Monte Carlo simulations, they conclude that the estimator that uses information only about the sign of the shock is nearly as (or, in some cases, more) efficient than the estimator based on the quantitative information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%