2008
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4607-07.2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitatively Different Hippocampal Subfield Engagement Emerges with Mastery of a Spatial Memory Task by Rats

Abstract: The parallel, entorhinal cortex projections to different hippocampal regions potentially support separate mnemonic functions. To examine this possibility, rats were trained in a radial-arm maze task so that hippocampal activity could be compared after "early" (two sessions) or "late" (five sessions) learning. Induction of the immediate-early gene Zif268 was then measured, so revealing possible activity differences across hippocampal subfields and the parahippocampal cortices. Each rat in the two experimental g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(110 reference statements)
5
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the differential temporal dynamics of CREB phosphorylation observed in CA1 (biphasic) and CA3 (monophasic) areas are consistent with previous findings reporting differential hippocampal subfields engagement according to the demands and the degree of mastery of a spatial task. In particular, this is consistent with the notion that CA3 may be important for the encoding of spatial information, whereas CA1 may rather be engaged in the maintenance of spatial representations and consolidation (Brun et al 2002) or retrieval processes (Kesner et al 2004;Remondes and Schuman 2004;Poirier et al 2008).…”
Section: Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Here, the differential temporal dynamics of CREB phosphorylation observed in CA1 (biphasic) and CA3 (monophasic) areas are consistent with previous findings reporting differential hippocampal subfields engagement according to the demands and the degree of mastery of a spatial task. In particular, this is consistent with the notion that CA3 may be important for the encoding of spatial information, whereas CA1 may rather be engaged in the maintenance of spatial representations and consolidation (Brun et al 2002) or retrieval processes (Kesner et al 2004;Remondes and Schuman 2004;Poirier et al 2008).…”
Section: Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our results lend further support to the hypothesis that at the molecular level, long-term maintenance of spatial representations in the hippocampus requires transcriptional events in neurons, and provide evidence that the transcription factor zif268 plays an important role in this process. The formation of spatial memory presumably involves widespread cortico-hippocampal connectivity networks within which specific regions and inputs may subserve distinct but interactive processing functions (6,28,29). Damage to structures conveying information to CA1 in these networks can affect CA1 place cell stability (30)(31)(32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the activity-regulated transcription factors, zif268, a member of the Egr family, is best characterized by its role in synaptic plasticity and memory consolidation. Zif268 is rapidly induced in association with long-term potentiation (LTP) and in defined brain structures and circuits after specific learning experiences (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Furthermore, mutant mice with targeted inactivation of the zif268 gene cannot maintain latephase LTP in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus and fail to form long-lasting memories (7), with particular sensitivity in hippocampal-dependent spatial memory tasks (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparatus consisted of an elevated radial maze. 40 Eight arms (65 cm long × 12 cm wide) ended by rectangular platforms (17 cm × 25 cm) were arranged around an octagonal central platform (33 cm diameter). Each arm could be automatically moved in an upward (open) or a downward position (close) by the experimenter monitoring rat movements using a video camera above the maze while located in a room directly adjacent to the testing room.…”
Section: Behavioral Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%