IntroductionA more severe form of a given disease negatively affects outcome in almost all human diseases. This seemed likely to apply to severe acquired aplastic anaemia (SAA), the pathophysiology of which is characterized by immune-mediated bone marrow failure. 1 A predominant oligoclonal immune response 2 by autologous T lymphocytes was shown to cause excessive apoptosis in stem and progenitor cells. 3,4 The molecular target of this T-cell response is still unknown, although in vitro a T-cell-mediated inhibition of aneuploid hematopoietic cells was demonstrated in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. 5 Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) 6 seems to be the appropriate treatment for an autoimmune disease, but tissue replacement by bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is still the treatment of first choice 7,8 because there have been 20% to 30% IST nonresponders, a significant proportion of patients with subnormal blood counts 9 and a high risk of relapse 10,11 and clonal disease. 12,13 Because of the long latency of response to IST, identification of predictors of response and survival would be helpful to assign patients to the appropriate regimen.In children very SAA (vSAA) is predominant (Ͼ 60%). Patients with vSAA are especially prone to develop life-threatening infections. As most of those high-risk patients lack an HLA-identical sibling donor (matched sibling donor; MSD), searching for a matched unrelated donor (MUD) was recommended, despite that BMT from a MUD is still complicated by a high risk of graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease. This recommendation was well founded on the basis of a previous retrospective analysis 14 in which the outcome for children with vSAA was the worst with IST consisting of antithymocyte-globulin (ATG) plus androgens and/or steroids (probability of survival: vSAA, 37%; SAA, 56%).Combined IST with ATG and cyclosporin A (CSA) has been shown to be superior to ATG alone or in combination with androgens in adults, 15,16 and the addition of granulocyte colonystimulating factor (G-CSF) to the treatment regimen was able to improve granulocyte recovery. 17,18 We conducted a prospective multicenter trial comparing combined IST plus G-CSF and BMT 19 to identify prognostic factors for response to therapy and survival.
Study designTwo hundred and thirteen patients newly diagnosed with SAA younger than the age of 17 years in 53 centers in Germany and Austria were included in A complete list of the members of the German/Austrian Aplastic Anemia Working Group appears in the "Appendix."Supported by the Friedrich-Baur-Stiftung (43/98), the Wilhelm-Sander-Stiftung (97.080.1), the Dr Sepp und Hanne Sturm Gedä chtnisstiftung, and AMGEN Germany.M.F., U.R., C.N., G.J.-S., W.F., A.B., and C.B.-G. conceived the study, designed the approach, and interpreted the data. M.F. wrote the paper. A.F. performed and interpreted the statistical analysis. I.B. reviewed the bone marrow biopsies to establish the correct diagnosis. 20 Zytogenetics and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for...