2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-004-0930-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality-adjusted survival analysis shows differences in outcome after immunosuppression or bone marrow transplantation in aplastic anemia

Abstract: Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and immunosuppression (IS) have improved the prognosis of aplastic anemia; both treatments have specific advantages and drawbacks but similar survival rates. Analysis of additional endpoints may help in treatment decisions. In a single-center study, patients with aplastic anemia treated with IS (n=155) or BMT (n=52) were compared for survival, event-free survival, and quality-adjusted time without symptoms and toxicity (Q-TWiST). Probability of overall and event-free survival … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4 The molecular target of this T-cell response is still unknown, although in vitro a T-cell-mediated inhibition of aneuploid hematopoietic cells was demonstrated in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. 5 Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) 6 seems to be the appropriate treatment for an autoimmune disease, but tissue replacement by bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is still the treatment of first choice 7,8 because there have been 20% to 30% IST nonresponders, a significant proportion of patients with subnormal blood counts 9 and a high risk of relapse 10,11 and clonal disease. 12,13 Because of the long latency of response to IST, identification of predictors of response and survival would be helpful to assign patients to the appropriate regimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 The molecular target of this T-cell response is still unknown, although in vitro a T-cell-mediated inhibition of aneuploid hematopoietic cells was demonstrated in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. 5 Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) 6 seems to be the appropriate treatment for an autoimmune disease, but tissue replacement by bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is still the treatment of first choice 7,8 because there have been 20% to 30% IST nonresponders, a significant proportion of patients with subnormal blood counts 9 and a high risk of relapse 10,11 and clonal disease. 12,13 Because of the long latency of response to IST, identification of predictors of response and survival would be helpful to assign patients to the appropriate regimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transplanted patients spent more time in complete remission without drugs and had longer periods free from symptoms (as well as time with extensive chronic GVHD). 38 …”
Section: Quality-of-life Issues In Aplastic Anemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] However, up to 40% of patients eventually relapse, and an additional 10% to 40% develop a secondary clonal disease. 3,4,7,8 Additional immunosuppressive drugs have been added to the ATG/CsA platform with hopes of decreasing relapse and secondary clonal disease, but so far no improvement in outcome has been observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%