2016
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xli-b1-1121-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Analysis on 3d Buidling Models Reconstructed From Uav Imagery

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Recent developments in UAV technology and structure from motion techniques have effected that UAVs are becoming standard platforms for 3D data collection. Because of their flexibility and ability to reach inaccessible urban parts, drones appear as optimal solution for urban applications. Building reconstruction from the data collected with UAV has the important potential to reduce labour cost for fast update of already reconstructed 3D cities. However, especially for updating of existing scenes derive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…UAVs can be considered as a tool of short-and close-range data acquisition from small areas [9], which leads to images with small GSDs. This data has the potential for fast updates of the reconstructed 3D city models with low costs [10] and large-scale spatial data [11]. The combination of UAS imagery with computer vision and photogrammetric techniques generates high accuracy point clouds, even with end-user, small format cameras [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UAVs can be considered as a tool of short-and close-range data acquisition from small areas [9], which leads to images with small GSDs. This data has the potential for fast updates of the reconstructed 3D city models with low costs [10] and large-scale spatial data [11]. The combination of UAS imagery with computer vision and photogrammetric techniques generates high accuracy point clouds, even with end-user, small format cameras [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elberink and Vosselman, 2011;Jarzabek-Rychard and Karpina, 2016;Soudarissanane et al, 2008), in this research planar fitting and completeness of the generated 3DPCs were measured. For the former a planar object (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Internal accuracy is related to the model precision, and different indicators can measure this 3DPC attribute. Based on previous methodologies (Oude Elberink and Vosselman, 2011;Jarzabek-Rychard and Karpina, 2016;Soudarissanane et al, 2008), in this research planar fitting and completeness of the generated 3DPCs were measured. For the former a planar object (e.g., roofs) was identified and extracted as 3DPC segments from every 3DPC and study area using CloudCompare (CloudCompare, 2017).…”
Section: Geometric Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%