2021 IEEE International Conferences on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing &Amp; Communications (GreenCom) An 2021
DOI: 10.1109/ithings-greencom-cpscom-smartdata-cybermatics53846.2021.00028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality and Cost Aware Service Selection in IoT-Context Management Platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer to this gap of time as the invalid gap for context provider (CP), where it cannot be used for refreshing. CPs are listed in order [ 6 ] since CoaaS need to be cost and quality-aware when selecting CPs for context retrieval. We use this to retrieve the context from the next best CP, the context from which could also be in the cache.…”
Section: Adaptive Context Refreshing With Policy Shiftingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We refer to this gap of time as the invalid gap for context provider (CP), where it cannot be used for refreshing. CPs are listed in order [ 6 ] since CoaaS need to be cost and quality-aware when selecting CPs for context retrieval. We use this to retrieve the context from the next best CP, the context from which could also be in the cache.…”
Section: Adaptive Context Refreshing With Policy Shiftingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As much as the data retrieval process for context derivation can benefit from optimizing techniques at the producer when the context providers are essentially not IoT devices (e.g., the calendar in the above example), deriving context would still yield an overhead that minimizes this benefit such that delivered context may no longer be relevant to the entity. Note that the raw data from which the context is derived from for each context entity, originate from “relevant” context providers [ 6 ] selected from billions of possible providers for billions of context consumers [ 1 ]. Therefore, streamlining the process of managing context retrieval or inventing an innovative method to reuse and repurpose retrieved and derived context using a caching technique is a compelling research problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The freshness of context (which inversely correlates with the age of context), its accuracy, completeness, and the latency of access to context are several parameters of Quality of Service (QoS). On the other hand, the price that the middleware incurs to access context information is referred to as the Cost of Context (CoC) [5]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to optimize data caching strategies to balance operational costs with the QoS provided.…”
Section: Motivation For Refresh Rate-based Caching and Prefetchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we cannot ignore the fact that the provider set freshness is most reliable until the provider is adequately dependablebased on the consumer's context requirements (e.g., sensors can be unreliable due to wear, or dust/residue accumulation on receptors). Hence, quality-based selection of providers at retrieval time [5] and techniques such as alternate context provider retrievals [15] can be required to maintain the cost and quality of context. The role of context providers in determining the Quality of Context is out of the scope of this paper because, (i) CMPs such as CoaaS rely on cost and quality-based context provider selection mechanisms prior to retrieving IoT data [5], and (ii) assuming the providers and state-of-the-art protocols such as CoAP and AMQP are fast and reliable.…”
Section: Transient Nature Of Iot Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QoC-based filtering and aggregation are seen as important features of LAURA. Jagarlamudi et al (2021) proposed a Service Level Agreement (SLA) template integrating a QoC-aware mechanism, called the Relative Reputation (RR), to select context providers with high RR values. The QoC evaluator generates the RR unit representing the match between QoC outcomes and QoC requirements.…”
Section: Qoc Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%