Quality and legal aspects in public care procurement

Abstract

Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to assess the applicability of care quality concepts as contract award criteria for public procurement of health and social care, using the case of Sweden. Design/methodology/approach-Based on a literature review, European and Swedish legal texts, government regulations as well as 26 Swedish court review cases concerning care procurement have been analysed. Findings-Methods used for assessing care quality are seldom useful for predicting the quality to be delivered by a potential contractor. Legal principles of transparency and equal treatment of tenderers make it necessary to apply strict requirements for verification. Research limitations/implications-Results refer primarily to a Swedish context but could be applicable throughout the EU. Further studies of relations between award criteria and public/private collaborative practices for improving care quality during contractual periods are desirable. Practical implications-Local and regional procurement officials should benefit from a better understanding of how quality criteria should be designed and applied to the award procedures for care contracts. Care providers in the private sector would also be able to develop their quality strategies and present their abilities more efficiently when tendering for public contracts. Social implications-Issues of quality of health and social care are of obvious importance for social sustainability. Public awareness of care quality problems is evident and often a cause of media concern. Originality/value-This investigation pinpoints the difference between traditional care quality thinking and the legal principles underlying contract award in public procurement of care services.

Auctioning out education: On exogenous privatisation through public procurement

“…One dilemma facing procuring institutions is having to weigh flexibility and control against each other. For example, there is a greater chance of receiving the service as asked for if the procurement’s contract notice is detailed and specific (Bröchner et al, 2016). However, this comes at the cost of flexibility, curriculum innovation and the possibility of making changes during the service provision, as there is little chance of altering contracts once they have been signed (Pugh et al, 2006; West and Currie, 2008).…”

How Procurement Judges The Value of Medical Technologies: A Review of Healthcare Tenders

“…We conducted a review of tender documents to solicit medical technologies for patient care in Canada, focusing on the request for proposal (RFP) tender type, where price is not expected to be determinative and factors such as product quality, service and company reputation are taken into account (19). We drew on templates and toolkits developed by Canada's healthcare procurement professional association to inform data collection and analysis (13).…”

Quality function deployment: exploiting interrelationships for progressive prioritization

“…Hu et al (2010) discussed the application of QFD in service quality management. Brochner et al (2016) carried out a detailed work on quality and legal aspects in public care procurement. Pakdil et al (2012) used QFD for qualitative and quantitative analysis in after sales services.…”