1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02697788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality and quantity: Reconstructing feminist methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another 'technique' consists of statistical verification, which may help us tear away the veil of impressions we form for ourselves on the basis of our daily experience (for a discussion on qualitative and quantitative methodologies in feminist research see Peplau and Conrad, 1989;Sprague and Zimmerman, 1989;Reinharz, 1992). An example of the enlightening potentialities ofstatistical data comes from the field of perinatal epidemiology.…”
Section: Statistical Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another 'technique' consists of statistical verification, which may help us tear away the veil of impressions we form for ourselves on the basis of our daily experience (for a discussion on qualitative and quantitative methodologies in feminist research see Peplau and Conrad, 1989;Sprague and Zimmerman, 1989;Reinharz, 1992). An example of the enlightening potentialities ofstatistical data comes from the field of perinatal epidemiology.…”
Section: Statistical Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, most of the scholars who construct feminist theory and produce women's studies course materials tend to be unfamiliar with institutional analyses of gender stratification that focus on the way that ecology and technology affect gender stratification, and they are unaware of social and behavioral work that involves numbers. Women sociologists remain divided on the issue of quantitative studies (Sprague and Zimmerman, 1989).…”
Section: Three Theories and A Social Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper addresses the conditions under which quantitative and qualitative research methods could be combined in special education. Mixed-method strategies have been called combining methods (e.g, Bifano, 1989), integrated methods (Sprague & Zimmerman, 1989;US Office of Technology Assessment, 1980-81), multimethod design (Durst & Schaeffer, 1987), multiple methods , triangulation (e.g., Denzin, 1979;Goetz & LeCompte, 1984;Kidder & Fine, 1987), imbedded strategies (Yin, 1989), eclectic methods (Beauchamp & Braden, 1989), complementary methods (Firestone, 1987), and quasi-ethnography or microethnography (Goetz & LeCompte, 1984). Yin (1989) used additional terminology, which will be discussed in the case study section later.…”
Section: Mixed Methods Research In Special Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%