2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Voice Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 However, previous studies that assessed quality and/or readability of patient education materials for various medical topics have unanimously shown these to be of lower quality and less readable than is ideal based on tools such as the DISCERN score. 12-15,20,27-31 This includes readability of major otolaryngology websites, 27 quality of online materials on common otolaryngology problems, 28 voice disorders. 30 vocal cord paralysis, 31 dysphagia, 12 thyroplasty, 13 and more.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23 However, previous studies that assessed quality and/or readability of patient education materials for various medical topics have unanimously shown these to be of lower quality and less readable than is ideal based on tools such as the DISCERN score. 12-15,20,27-31 This includes readability of major otolaryngology websites, 27 quality of online materials on common otolaryngology problems, 28 voice disorders. 30 vocal cord paralysis, 31 dysphagia, 12 thyroplasty, 13 and more.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two strong studies were performed to assess the quality of information on voice disorders and vocal fold paralysis. Dueppen et al focused on vocal hygiene, vocal health, and prevention of vocal disorders, 30 and uniquely used five different Google search engines with country-specific suffixes to capture a wider body of information. They also categorized websites based on the source (government, non-profit, and commercial) and included the Health on Net (HON) qualification as a measure of quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the same procedure to extract data as other studies examining online content. 17,[19][20][21] A panel of two speechlanguage pathologists that served children with a S/LD, nine parents of children with a S/LD, and three early childhood teachers were asked to provide keywords that might be used when searching for information related to S/LDs. They provided 30 unique keywords or phrases they considered to be most likely used when searching for information on the Internet.…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corresponds to a significant distance to the optimal score of 80 so that at best an average quality of online available information can be confirmed. A HON certificate was only found in 0-30.6 % of the analyzed internet pages [103,111,122,133,134,136,138]. An overview about the studies on ENT-specific diseases is found in ▶ table 2, an overview about the procedures is given in ▶table 3.…”
Section: Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%