2017
DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1362034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality and readability of English-language internet information for aphasia

Abstract: Current aphasia treatment websites were found to exhibit low levels of quality and readability, creating potential accessibility problems for people with aphasia and significant others. Websites including treatment information for aphasia must be improved in order to increase greater information accessibility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They include two well‐established readability tests, the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG Index) * and the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) † formula. 2 , 4 In addition, we include measures of sentence length and word length. Word and sentence length drive the readability tests and including them allow for a disaggregated view of the data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They include two well‐established readability tests, the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG Index) * and the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) † formula. 2 , 4 In addition, we include measures of sentence length and word length. Word and sentence length drive the readability tests and including them allow for a disaggregated view of the data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 The Linux tool wget was used to download all the contents on the DHHS and DET websites. 2 The downloaded data contained HTML files as well as other types of documents/images. In this step, we recursively searched all website directories and select only HTML files.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We followed the same procedure to extract data as other studies examining online content. 17,[19][20][21] A panel of two speechlanguage pathologists that served children with a S/LD, nine parents of children with a S/LD, and three early childhood teachers were asked to provide keywords that might be used when searching for information related to S/LDs. They provided 30 unique keywords or phrases they considered to be most likely used when searching for information on the Internet.…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%