Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Myocardial Infarction: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to assess the quality and reliability of the disease information available on YouTube ( www.youtube.com ) about “heart attacks” or myocardial infarctions, using a Global Quality Score (GQS) for quality, a DISCERN score for reliability, and a Video Power Index (VPI) for popularity. Methodology: In this cross-sectional observational study, the YouTube videos were analyzed in terms of the type of uploader, content, and other factors. The GQS, DISCERN score, and Video Power Index (VPI) were utilized to assess the quality, reliability, and popularity of the information, respectively. Results: The majority of the videos (78.44%) were uploaded over a year ago. Only 33.34% and 7.84% were uploaded by doctors and healthcare organizations, respectively. Around 72.55% of the videos contained information about symptoms, 66.67% discussed the causes, 52.94% covered treatment, and 47.06% focused on prevention. Additionally, 41.18% provided details on investigations, while only 19.61% touched upon mortality. Patient-created videos accounted for 19.61% of the content, and 15.69% of the videos included promotional material. Conclusion: The main outcome of our study indicates that the YouTube videos examined regarding myocardial infarctions exhibit high-quality content, as supported by a higher average GQS score. The consistent quality of information discovered in our study suggests that YouTube can serve as an additional platform for sharing knowledge and educating individuals about this important health condition. By raising awareness and delivering accurate information, these videos can help in early detection, prevention, and better outcomes for individuals who are at risk of experiencing a myocardial infarction.

YouTube as a Patient Information Source for Gastrointestinal Reflux Disease

“…The analysis revealed that within the majority of the videos analyzed, 58 (82.9%) of them were uploaded more than a year ago; this suggests that perhaps the YouTube content available for gastroesophageal reflux disease is outdated. These findings are similar to the findings of a similar study conducted by Holge et al, which reported 40 videos (78.44%) [ 11 ]. Outdated information can be misleading due to advances in care and support with further research.…”

“…With adequate lifestyle changes and an understanding of how to use educational resources thoroughly, patients have the ability to combat this disease with knowledge. Various Studies have successfully proved and cited the benefits of resources such as YouTube as an asset when exploring a particular disease [ 10 , 11 ]. A patient is able to explore the possible cause and etiology, clinical presentation, symptoms, diagnosing tools and tests, prevention and vaccines, treatment options, complications, and support and management options.…”

Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Content Available on YouTube About Palpitations

“…Overall, median GQS scores based on uploader type were found to be of good quality, with news channels and patients suffering from the disease having the highest median GQS scores (5, respectively). Holge et al also found that the YouTube videos they examined regarding myocardial infarction exhibited high-quality content, supported by a higher average GQS score [21]. These findings contrast those by This study also found reliability of videos was not significantly associated with uploader type, and found low median reliability scores among the various uploader types, as well.…”

“…Our study found that 59.15% of the videos were regarding the treatment of palpitations. Similarly, Hogle et al reported that 52.94% of the videos they studied had treatment information [21]. Fewer videos we studied had content regarding support groups (4.23%).…”

“…Notably, only 11.27% of videos had promotional content by pharmaceutical companies or doctors. Hogle et al reported similar results (15.69%) [21].…”