2014
DOI: 10.7166/25-1-618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality And Safety Management Systems: Joint Action For Certification Of Small Firms In An Industrial Cluster In Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some recently published studies concern with cases of abandonment of integrated management (Gianni and Gotzamani, 2015), the integration of risk management in IT settings within MSs (Barafort et al , 2016), the development of IMSs in the food activity sector (Surkov et al , 2015), the analysis of IMSs encompassing solely the QMS and the OHSMS (Gerolamo et al , 2014; Vitoreli and Carpinetti, 2013), the performance indicators adopted in an integrated context (Olaru, Pirnea, Hohan and Maftei, 2014), the analysis of the specifications, such as PAS 99, that may assist on the implementation of IMSs (Nowicki et al , 2013) and on the resources needed for a proper integrated management (Savino and Batbaatar, 2015). The relationship within the OHSMS and QMS was pointed out by Karanikas (2014); MSs integration as a pillar for organizational sustainability was discussed by Mohamad et al (2014) and Mežinska et al (2013); Oliveira (2013) listed some guidelines for the integration of certifiable MSs; Bamber et al (2014) revised the ISO MSs certification in the UK agricultural sector; Mesquida and Mas (2015) and Marques et al (2014) brought to the light some of the issues concerning the integration of IT service management requirements into the organizational MS; and Ibarra and Calarge (2014) presented a proposal to leverage improvements on IMSs applying Zachman’s arquitecture.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recently published studies concern with cases of abandonment of integrated management (Gianni and Gotzamani, 2015), the integration of risk management in IT settings within MSs (Barafort et al , 2016), the development of IMSs in the food activity sector (Surkov et al , 2015), the analysis of IMSs encompassing solely the QMS and the OHSMS (Gerolamo et al , 2014; Vitoreli and Carpinetti, 2013), the performance indicators adopted in an integrated context (Olaru, Pirnea, Hohan and Maftei, 2014), the analysis of the specifications, such as PAS 99, that may assist on the implementation of IMSs (Nowicki et al , 2013) and on the resources needed for a proper integrated management (Savino and Batbaatar, 2015). The relationship within the OHSMS and QMS was pointed out by Karanikas (2014); MSs integration as a pillar for organizational sustainability was discussed by Mohamad et al (2014) and Mežinska et al (2013); Oliveira (2013) listed some guidelines for the integration of certifiable MSs; Bamber et al (2014) revised the ISO MSs certification in the UK agricultural sector; Mesquida and Mas (2015) and Marques et al (2014) brought to the light some of the issues concerning the integration of IT service management requirements into the organizational MS; and Ibarra and Calarge (2014) presented a proposal to leverage improvements on IMSs applying Zachman’s arquitecture.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These operations align with the characteristics described by Wenger (1998). Firstly, members learn from each other to enhance their digital marketing capabilities and engage in integrated marketing, demonstrating mutual engagement for more productive learning and development (Gerolamo, Carpinetti, Vitoreli, Sordan & Lima, 2014). Secondly, members share a common mission and collaborate for mutual benefit, reflecting the characteristics of a joint venture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This is possible because a QMS is a tool capable of bringing control and standardization to an organizational processes. Thus, it allows the effectiveness of actions to be measured without losing focus on meeting consumer expectations [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%