Quality Assessment for the Sustainable Provision of Software Components and Digital Research Infrastructures for the Arts and Humanities

Buddenbohm, Stefan; Matoni, Markus; Schmunk, Stefan; Thiel, Carsten

doi:10.1515/bfp-2017-0024

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, many of these information needs have been recurrently identified over time (Star and Ruhleder, 1994), problematic that may respond to the fact that the focus is usually placed on technical concerns without considering the distinct scholarly practices between SSH scholars and computer/data scientists. Likewise, some of these requirements (e.g., the ones related to RI evaluation) will not be achieved unless the information service receives continuous funding, something that is not always the case in RIs (Buddenbohm et al, 2017).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Putting the User in the Loop: Developing a Research Infrastructure for Social Sciences and Humanities Research

Sendra,

Late,

Kumpulainen

2023

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of research infrastructures (RIs) for social sciences and humanities (SSH) research is still incipient. Few of the existing facilities face several challenges that complicate researchers' interactions with RIs and its digital tools and materials. This study explores the creation of an information service for conducting data‐intensive SSH research by placing the end‐user at the center. Particularly, the study investigated what factors affect the development of the RI and if this process is integrating all the information needs of end‐users, putting a special focus on how these facilities should be evaluated. A qualitative analysis of 13 semi‐structured interviews with SSH scholars and computer/data scientists revealed three themes: developing a RI, needs and expectations of the RI, relationship with user feedback and user interactions. Based on our findings, we were able to raise several design implications to create more successful and sustainable information services for supporting SSH research processes.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Putting the User in the Loop: Developing a Research Infrastructure for Social Sciences and Humanities Research

Sendra,

Late,

Kumpulainen

2023

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At the same time, existing quality measures, such as ISO standards, can be one frame of reference (see e.g. Buddenbohm et al 2017), while (Doorn et al 2016) suggest establishing an independent certification, modelled on the Data Seal of Approval, now CoreTrustSeal (CoreTrustSeal 2018).…”

Section: Sustainability Of Tools and Softwarementioning

confidence: 99%

A landscape of data – working with digital resources within and beyond DARIAH

Kálmán

Durco

Fischer

et al. 2019

Int J Digit Humanities

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The way researchers in the arts and humanities disciplines work has changed significantly. Research can no longer be done in isolation as an increasing number of digital tools and certain types of knowledge are required to deal with research material. Research questions are scaled up and we see the emergence of new infrastructures to address this change. The DigitAl Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities (DARIAH) is an open international network of researchers within the arts and humanities community, which revolves around the exchange of experiences and the sharing of expertise and resources. These resources comprise not only of digitised material, but also a wide variety of borndigital data, services and software, tools, learning and teaching materials. The sustaining, sharing and reuse of resources involves many different parties and stakeholders and is influenced by a multitude of factors in which research infrastructures play a pivotal role. This article describes how DARIAH tries to meet the requirements of researchers from a broad range of disciplines within the arts and humanities that work with (born-)digital research data. It details approaches situated in specific national contexts in an otherwise large heterogeneous international scenario and gives an overview of ongoing efforts towards a convergence of social and technical aspects.

show abstract

“…Ⅲ) Librarian construction: The digital humanistic practice has put forward new requirements for librarians. Jie Li put forward that in order to realize the role transformation of librarians, we need to learn and explore from 5 aspects: data manager, resource discovery and integrator, interdisciplinary knowledge transmitter, content disseminator and promoter, and infrastructure builder [12] .Huan Ling believed that librarians should have the ability to guide readers to read humanities books, interact with readers fully and analyze information according to readers' requirements [13] .…”

Section: B the Construction Of Library Resourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on the Developing Approach of Digital Humanities in the Field of Library Science in China

He¹,

Ya²

2018

Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Computer Science, Electronics and Communication Engineering (CSECE 2018)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Under the tide of digital humanities, the Library actively participates in the research and practice. It has made considerable achievements. Based on the research documents collected by the CNKI and WOS database, this research reviews digital humanities in the field of Library Science. This article attempts to analyze the hot spots and development trends in order to gain a deeper understanding of research results and forecast the future research direction. The basic issues of digital humanities, library resources construction, library services and scientific research support. According to the analysis and discussion of the research and practice, the key points can be concluded to three parts, they are collaborative communication during country and domain, create good digital humanities atmosphere, carry out the research in an innovative way.

show abstract

Quality Assessment for the Sustainable Provision of Software Components and Digital Research Infrastructures for the Arts and Humanities

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Putting the User in the Loop: Developing a Research Infrastructure for Social Sciences and Humanities Research

Putting the User in the Loop: Developing a Research Infrastructure for Social Sciences and Humanities Research

A landscape of data – working with digital resources within and beyond DARIAH

Research on the Developing Approach of Digital Humanities in the Field of Library Science in China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About