2005
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2005.851087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Assessment of Biometric Systems: A Comprehensive Perspective Based on Accuracy and Performance Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discriminative methods are also sensitive to noise. It remains an interesting topic for future work to develop and analyze the accuracy of a discriminative dictionary learning algorithm that is robust to pose, expression and illumination variations [49]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discriminative methods are also sensitive to noise. It remains an interesting topic for future work to develop and analyze the accuracy of a discriminative dictionary learning algorithm that is robust to pose, expression and illumination variations [49]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15. From the curves, the Equal Error Rate (EER) with 95% confi- dence interval of our algorithm is 2.68±0.18% assuming uncorrelated matching decisions [51], [52]. The threshold at the EER point is approximately 0.420.…”
Section: Fingerprint Verification Based On Combined Featuresmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Differently from traditional procedures used for the accuracy evaluation of biometric recognition algorithms, which do not consider the time passed between biometric acquisitions [24], this test permits to analyze the stability and persistency of the used features during a defined time interval. In this test, we have not used samples considered as FTA since it only aims to evaluate the persistency of PPG DET curve obtained on DB 15m .…”
Section: B Preliminary Test In Continuous Authentication Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%