2017
DOI: 10.1364/ao.56.00f158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality assessment of refocus criteria for particle imaging in digital off-axis holography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, a large variety of metrics has been proposed to perform the in-focus reconstruction automatically. 16,34 Of course the channel height might influence the computational burden of this step, since it sets the volume to be digitally scanned to look for the sample best focus plane. The phase aberration compensation step can be achieved with fitting-based processing 35 or by acquiring a reference hologram (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, a large variety of metrics has been proposed to perform the in-focus reconstruction automatically. 16,34 Of course the channel height might influence the computational burden of this step, since it sets the volume to be digitally scanned to look for the sample best focus plane. The phase aberration compensation step can be achieved with fitting-based processing 35 or by acquiring a reference hologram (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reconstruction plane. Several metrics for the refocus plane detection relying on the phase distribution [18][19][20], amplitude [21,22] of the reconstructed images or mix of these [23] are reported and discussed in the literature [24,25]. These metrics involve criteria such as the image derivative [26], it histogram [27], it autocorrelation function [28].…”
Section: Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is easy to achieve for lens imaging. However, due to the limitation of resolution and magnification in digital holography, the transverse size of the object under test or the virtual image of the front imaging system is usually comparable to the size of the CCD/CMOS chip, so the space-variance effect is very common in digital holography, especially digital Fresnel holography [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%