2016
DOI: 10.1515/labmed-2016-0066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality assurance and standardization in view of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)

Abstract: Abstract:The development and utilization of non-invasive prenatal tests have provided new and exciting challenges for quality assurance. Quality managers, scientists and technicians have been faced with the question of appropriate validation and quality controls for these innovative tests. Guidelines on quality assurance and quality control are still lacking and the need is growing inexorably. To integrate non-invasive prenatal tests into existing guidelines, attention must be paid to ISO standard 15189 which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the results of a first ring trial scheme have been communicated by the Reference Institute for Bioanalytics (RfB), a notified body for external quality assessment in Germany, such schemes need further development. Schenk, who, together with Harasim, was the first to succeed in achieving a medical accreditation for a NIPT procedure in Germany by the DAkkS (the German accreditation body), provides a comprehensive summary on the different aspects of quality management and accreditation in cffDNA [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the results of a first ring trial scheme have been communicated by the Reference Institute for Bioanalytics (RfB), a notified body for external quality assessment in Germany, such schemes need further development. Schenk, who, together with Harasim, was the first to succeed in achieving a medical accreditation for a NIPT procedure in Germany by the DAkkS (the German accreditation body), provides a comprehensive summary on the different aspects of quality management and accreditation in cffDNA [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%