1981
DOI: 10.1021/ac00237a001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality assurance of chemical measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
182
0
7

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
182
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The LOD and LOQ for determination of 1-hydroxypyrene by this method were calculated as 3.3S 0 and 10S 0 respectively [22], where S 0 is the standard deviation from the analysis of eight artificial urine samples spiked at a concentration at 20 ng/L.…”
Section: Limit Of Detection (Lod) and Limit Of Quantitation (Loq)-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LOD and LOQ for determination of 1-hydroxypyrene by this method were calculated as 3.3S 0 and 10S 0 respectively [22], where S 0 is the standard deviation from the analysis of eight artificial urine samples spiked at a concentration at 20 ng/L.…”
Section: Limit Of Detection (Lod) and Limit Of Quantitation (Loq)-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QA includes promoting, monitoring, and evaluating the overall laboratory testing process. QA is typically accomplished by auditing the test management (e.g., collecting and identifying specimen and reporting test results), quality control, and personnel performance and training [18].…”
Section: Quality Assurance and Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taylor method (LOD=3S 0 , where S 0 is the extrapolated standard deviation [SD] as the concentration of the analyte approaches zero based on a series of measurements at low concentrations plotted against their calculated SDs) when the need to estimate the false-negative rate is remote or when the assay is used infrequently [18]. Several different approaches exist to estimate laboratory test results below the LOD (<LOD) that can be used to derive population estimates, such as a reference interval.…”
Section: Lodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibrants at 80, 800, 2000, and 8000 nM (ϳ15 to 1500 ng/mL) for all analytes, and at 8 nM (1.8 ng/mL) for BHETEE only were found to have individual accuracies between 89% and 113% and individual run-to-run precision Ͻ15% RSD for all transitions. For quantitative analysis at ultra-trace levels, these accuracies°and°precisions°are°considered°acceptable° [43].°Fig-ures of merit were roughly estimated from a few experiments rather than rigorously determined because our only intent was to assess the feasibility of developing a quantitative mass spectrometry method predicated on the superoxide adduct rather than to perform a complete validation. Limitations of this report therefore include the low number of quantitative experiments performed, the lack of internal standards and the number and distribution of calibrants across a wide dynamic range.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Superoxide Adduct For Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result illustrates the exceptional response of BHETEE compared with the other analytes. For the purposes of this report, the instrument limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were calculated as 3S 0 and 10S 0 , respectively, where S 0 is "the value of the standard deviation°as°the°concentration°approaches°zero"° [43].°S 0 was estimated at 95% CL as the y-intercept of the linear regression of the estimated standard deviations of three calibrators°versus°their°expected°concentrations° [43]. LODs based on S 0 estimated from this method agree with the experimental results in that the calculated LODs are between the lowest calibrator that was accurately measured and the lowest calibrator analyzed, but not°detected.°For°brevity,°the°data°presented°in°Table°3 represents figures of merit for observations derived from the product of four analyses and three precursor/ product ion transitions.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Superoxide Adduct For Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%