2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.104002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality by Design: Comparison of Design Space construction methods in the case of Design of Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method of ruggedness were determined by carrying out the method by the three different analyst and taking the absorbance and results are reported in terms of mean of percentage relative standard deviation [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Ruggednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The method of ruggedness were determined by carrying out the method by the three different analyst and taking the absorbance and results are reported in terms of mean of percentage relative standard deviation [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Ruggednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of accuracy was carried out by recovery study from API at three different level such as 80%, 100% 120%. Percentage recovery should be within 98%-102% [4,[11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although DoE can be used to identify correlations between process parameters and their influence on the final productivity, the complex bioprocess is reduced to a few key numbers (e.g., final product concentration), and the dynamics of growth and metabolism are not sufficiently taken into account [ 1 , 13 , 14 ]. In addition, the heuristic conception of a DoE by choosing the limits of the parameter space poses a particular challenge [ 15 17 ]. Thus, there is a high risk that the experiments carried out were wrongly chosen and have only insufficient validity, which results in further costs and time delays [ 1 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clear understanding of how changes in the formulation or process variables affect the final product quality is very important in order to reduce waste produced during the process. Design of Experiment and multivariate analysis has been used in the past to establish the design space in which the granulation process would result in the production of a product with desired attributes and develop correlations between the product attributes and input variables [9][10][11][12][13][14]. The pharmaceutical industry has adopted the concept of Quality by Design has been used to produced solid dosage forms with desired functionality [9,[13][14][15][16][17][18] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%