2017
DOI: 10.3923/ajft.2017.262.270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Characteristics of Beef Burger as Influenced by Different Levels of Orange Peel Powder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
19
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher ash, carbohydrate and fiber content in F2, F3 and F4 are due to the higher amount of these nutrients present in SPPF compared to meat. Similar results were verified after the addition of orange peel flour (5%) in bovine hamburger (Mahmoud et al, 2017). Protein, lipid and caloric contents were lower for SPPF-added hamburgers since SPPF contains lower levels of these nutrients compared to meat.…”
Section: Physicochemical Compositionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The higher ash, carbohydrate and fiber content in F2, F3 and F4 are due to the higher amount of these nutrients present in SPPF compared to meat. Similar results were verified after the addition of orange peel flour (5%) in bovine hamburger (Mahmoud et al, 2017). Protein, lipid and caloric contents were lower for SPPF-added hamburgers since SPPF contains lower levels of these nutrients compared to meat.…”
Section: Physicochemical Compositionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The highest total phenolics content was obtained at addition of dried marjoram leaves to burger, where the value was 406.29 and the lowest total phenolics content (189.14 mg/100 g) were recorded for control burger. This observation was in agreement with those reported by Mahmoud et al(2017), who reported that the addition of orange peel to burger increased the total phenol content. Therefore, the addition of marjoram to burger improved the antioxidant activity compared to control burger, where the values were 13.39, 18.98, 28.30 and 34.45 mM TE/ 100 g for RB0, RB1, RB2 and RB3, respectively (Table 5).…”
Section: Total Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity Of Raw Beef supporting
confidence: 94%
“…As shown in Table (7), the replacing of meat with 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 % marjoram caused a slight decrease in the pH values of raw and cooked burgers compared with pH value of control burgers. Aleson-Carbonell et al, (2005) and Mahmoud et al,(2017) found that, the pH values of burgers fortified with different levels of lemon albedo and orange peel were lower than the control sample, these results may be due to its organic acids content such as citric and ascorbic acids. From the same table, it could be also observed that water holding capacity (WHC) of burgers increased by increasing marjoram level from 1.5 to 3.5 %.…”
Section: Physicochemical Properties Of Burgersmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations