2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-20612013005000072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality characteristics of Moroccan sweet paprika (Capsicum annuum L.) at different sampling times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
22
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute amount of potassium in fruit showed low variations beetween the growing method exept in landrace Loko snička where the differences in K content between growing method quite different. Zaki et al (2013) in Marrocos and Tepić et al (2008) in Serbian paprika, obtained similar results. Paprika samples were rich in potassium, calcium and magne-sium, and relatively poor in sodium, while heavy metals (Pb, Cd) where not detected (Krstic et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The absolute amount of potassium in fruit showed low variations beetween the growing method exept in landrace Loko snička where the differences in K content between growing method quite different. Zaki et al (2013) in Marrocos and Tepić et al (2008) in Serbian paprika, obtained similar results. Paprika samples were rich in potassium, calcium and magne-sium, and relatively poor in sodium, while heavy metals (Pb, Cd) where not detected (Krstic et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The surface color parameters published are related to the pericarp as an edible part of pepper fruits. The degree of maturity of the pepper [32,33], the influence of the drying and processing conditions [34,35], and the differences in pepper varieties have been studied by using the surface color characteristics. The pericarp is characterized with lower values of L* (29.9531.61) and b* (6.9910.49).…”
Section: Surface Colormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pericarp is characterized with lower values of L* (29.9531.61) and b* (6.9910.49). The a* values are higher and varied from 21.81 to 31.10 [33,34].…”
Section: Surface Colormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vulnerability of analysis based on the morphological character is susceptible to environmental influences 8 . However, this method works in detecting variations of C.anuum L. [8][9][10][11] as well as some reportedly different morphological characteristics between C. frutescens L. and C. annum L. 12,13 . The molecular approach to the analysis of genetic variation is generally done to support morphological observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%