2014
DOI: 10.4324/9781315068510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Circle Time in the Secondary School

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Circle time requires children to respond only when holding a particular object (Miller & Moran, ; Mosley, ) (here, a “magic stone”). The Mosley Model of circle time has introductory, middle and closing phases (citing Mosley, , pp. 99–102).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Circle time requires children to respond only when holding a particular object (Miller & Moran, ; Mosley, ) (here, a “magic stone”). The Mosley Model of circle time has introductory, middle and closing phases (citing Mosley, , pp. 99–102).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the focus of talking circles has often been acts of crime or disorder, this approach could also be used for addressing social harm and discussing school practices. Indeed, there is already a precedent for such engagement in UK and US schools in the form of 'circle time', which involves whole group communication, where everybody has a chance to speak and a 'talking piece' is utilised (Mosley and Tew 1999). More research in this area is required and it would seem sensible to first empirically assess the impact of a small number of talking circles focusing upon harmful issues in schools before advocating a wider adoption of this approach.…”
Section: Zemiological Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, Circle Time (Mosley, 1996), Circle of Friends (Pearpoint & Forest, 1992;Newton, Taylor, & Wilson, 1996), Sharing Circles (Palomares, Schuster, & Watkins, 1992), Circle of Adults (CoA, Wilson, & Newton, 2006) and Solution Circles (SCs, Forest, & Pearpoint, 1996). The authors of these approaches draw on a range of theoretical models to explain the psychological processes involved in their problem-solving frameworks, such as social constructivism (Kukla, 2000), narrative approaches (Morgan, 2000), Rogerian principles (Rogers, 1951), psychodynamic insights (Hanko, 1999), hermeneutics (Palmer, 1969) and social interactionist theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Mosley (1996) described the circle as a symbol of unity, healing and power, with a strong cultural history. She noted that many cultures utilised the problem-solving potential of the symbolic circle, including North American Indians and Anglo-Saxon Monks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%