Terry D. Rothgeb,M.A.This studv wus devekoped to creute u data buse on the use of portjiolio reviews to control enrollment in interior design programs in North America. Data identijied those progrums with portji>lio reviews, length of existence (f review, level of' occurrence, composition oj' jury knowledge andlor skills reviewed, e-rpected student performance, und options resulting jrom the review. Questionnuires were sent to 324 interior design program directors; there was a 61% return response. A statistical unulvsis svstem was used jtor treutment of the duta. Ninety-three schools were identijied as having u portjdio review. Statistics indicuted that the most jrequent point of' review occurred in the second yeur and that the jury consisted primurilv of interior design fuculty. The review items ident$ed as huving the most importance in a portfolio review included creutivity, drawing, drajhg, design elements and principles, design concept, and rendering. Other datu dealt with various optional results of' porrfolio review purticipants.The interior design profession has experienced incredible growth and change in the past 20 years. As the industry underwent a metamorphosis caused by professional growth, educators were forced to deal with both radical changes in the industry and rapid growth in the student population. Each year, in nearly 350 interior design programs offered throughout North 'Copyright, 1989, Interior Design Educators Council, Journal ofltiterior Design Education America, thousands Of students graduand Research 15(2):21-28.