1986
DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90164-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality control aspects of blood pressure measurements in the multiple risk factor intervention trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These variables included age; educational attainment (number of school years completed); number of years from menopause to brain imaging; use of hormone therapy (0 = never, 1 = former, 2 = current); body mass index (BMI; weight in kg / height in m 2 ); smoking status (0 = nonsmoker, 1 = former smoker, and 2 = current smoker); alcoholic beverage consumption (defined as the number of single-serving alcoholic beverages consumed per week). At the laboratory and MRI sessions, we measured three auscultatory blood pressure levels according to the protocol of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (Dischinger et al, 1986). After discarding the first blood pressure measurement to allow for adaptation, the average of the remaining two measures combined across the sessions was taken as an estimate of seated resting blood pressure.…”
Section: Assessment Of Confounding Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variables included age; educational attainment (number of school years completed); number of years from menopause to brain imaging; use of hormone therapy (0 = never, 1 = former, 2 = current); body mass index (BMI; weight in kg / height in m 2 ); smoking status (0 = nonsmoker, 1 = former smoker, and 2 = current smoker); alcoholic beverage consumption (defined as the number of single-serving alcoholic beverages consumed per week). At the laboratory and MRI sessions, we measured three auscultatory blood pressure levels according to the protocol of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (Dischinger et al, 1986). After discarding the first blood pressure measurement to allow for adaptation, the average of the remaining two measures combined across the sessions was taken as an estimate of seated resting blood pressure.…”
Section: Assessment Of Confounding Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline BP was defined as the average of the second and third readings recorded at the second and third screening visits (18).…”
Section: Screening and Baseline Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the laboratory, we obtained a medical history and anthropometric and demographic information. At the laboratory and MRI sessions, we also recorded 3 auscultatory measures of resting blood pressure following the protocol of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial, 20 with resting blood pressure defined as the average of the final 2 readings combined across the sessions. Body mass index (BMI) was computed as weight (in kilograms)/height (in meters squared).…”
Section: Study Protocol and Covariate Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%