2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Control Methods for Optimal BCR-ABL1 Clinical Testing in Human Whole Blood Samples

Abstract: Reliable breakpoint cluster region (BCR)--Abelson (ABL) 1 measurement is essential for optimal management of chronic myelogenous leukemia. There is a need to optimize quality control, sensitivity, and reliability of methods used to measure a major molecular response and/or treatment failure. The effects of room temperature storage time, different primers, and RNA input in the reverse transcription (RT) reaction on BCR-ABL1 and β-glucuronidase (GUSB) cDNA yield were assessed in whole blood samples mixed with K5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 logs above the limit for DNA qPCR, we note that recent modifications of the RT-qPCR assay for BCR-ABL1 have been claimed to provide greater sensitivity. 15,16 However, increasing the sensitivity of RT-qPCR carries the risk that false-positive results will be observed owing to the presence of rare BCR-ABL1 transcripts derived from nonleukemic cells. 8 Because rare targets have been detected using recently developed dedicated digital PCR instruments, we also investigated use of the QX100 system (Bio-Rad Laboratories) to perform digital PCR on CML samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 logs above the limit for DNA qPCR, we note that recent modifications of the RT-qPCR assay for BCR-ABL1 have been claimed to provide greater sensitivity. 15,16 However, increasing the sensitivity of RT-qPCR carries the risk that false-positive results will be observed owing to the presence of rare BCR-ABL1 transcripts derived from nonleukemic cells. 8 Because rare targets have been detected using recently developed dedicated digital PCR instruments, we also investigated use of the QX100 system (Bio-Rad Laboratories) to perform digital PCR on CML samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently reported that use of gene specific priming in RT increases yield of cDNA by 10–100 fold compared to oligo dT or random hexamer priming when applied to RNA from human peripheral blood leukocytes [26] . Because FFPE treatment typically reduces yield of cDNA from RNA by 100-fold, we evaluated the utility of gene specific priming relative to random hexamer priming to increase signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of different conditions on reverse transcription (RT) efficiency, including priming with random hexamer primers (RHP) or GSP and use of 1 or 5 µg of RNA in the 30 µl RT reaction, was assessed with three FFPE samples. A previously described test using the External RNA Control Consortium (ERCC) standards was used to measure RT efficiency [26] . After completion of these studies, optimal RT conditions were selected consisting of a 30 µl RT reaction with 1 µg of RNA, gene-specific RT primer (the PCR reverse primer) (3 µ M ), and SuperScript III First Strand Synthesis System (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique is very well described, 1 has been in use for many decades, 2 and has several advantages, including identification of preanalytical errors such as specimen misidentification and instrumentation errors. 3 Within the realm of molecular diagnostics, in contrast, most quality control in the field has taken cues from high-volume clinical chemistry laboratories, focusing on detecting preanalytical issues such as DNA integrity and input quantities 4 or analytical issues like DNA contamination or interrun variability with Levey-Jennings plots. 5,6 However, no studies that we know of have looked at the utility of intrapatient variability (delta checks) in monitoring molecular assays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%