2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12051874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Decision-Making Behavior of Bodies Participating in the Agri-Foods E-Supply Chain

Abstract: The quality of agri-foods in e-supply chains confronts more threats than that in the traditional agri-food supply chain. However, most of the existing studies focusing on the quality problems of fresh agri-products are mainly cases studies and statistical analyses, and they do not take into account the farmers’ willingness to comply with safe agri-food supply procedures. To solve the supply quality problems of fresh agri-foods and help participators make a better choice, the decision-making behavior on the sup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HMR marketing activities are also primarily carried out on SNS and online to target the Z generation and young couples who are highly dependent on mobile purchases [ 38 , 39 ]. Since an HMR is a consumer product with a relatively low degree of involvement, innovative supply management, such as an e-chain system or quality certification, can significantly influence decision making [ 40 ].…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…HMR marketing activities are also primarily carried out on SNS and online to target the Z generation and young couples who are highly dependent on mobile purchases [ 38 , 39 ]. Since an HMR is a consumer product with a relatively low degree of involvement, innovative supply management, such as an e-chain system or quality certification, can significantly influence decision making [ 40 ].…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumer Willingness leans strongly towards intangible exchange, because customer relationship management [64], customer satisfaction [65], loyalty, trust, etc., are largely discussed in this theme, but tangible resources, for example, web assurance seal services [66], and product and price [67], are still partly within the discussion. The Possible Solutions theme contains abundant intangible content such as political suggestions to encourage government participation [120], an optimization model of the agricultural products' distribution in an e-commerce channel [112], information sharing [117], etc. In the theme of Opportunities and Barriers, papers try to illustrate potential avenues and opportunities through intangible perspectives, for example, by using the SWOT method to describe AE strategies [100], legal regulation of digital development [102], etc.…”
Section: Themesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two themes shift their attention to humanity elements, treating consumers as the major participants, seeking to offer solutions and to promote AE's efficiency from understanding consumers' demands, and at the same time, seeking companies' potential joint participation. In these two themes, consumer values and loyalty [63], and social network and multi-channel participation [120] are found frequently. One paper in the theme of Possible Solution directly borrows S-D logic to understand how digital commerce enables value co-creation in the vegetable supply chain in Indonesia [114].…”
Section: Themesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important in regard to e-commerce and supply chains is 'comparing different decision models of agri-food e-supply chains, showing that the decentralized decision model is better than the centralized model from the view of quality protection', adding that the farmers willingness to supply high-quality agri-foods increases with the increase in the consumers' consciousness of their rights and the government's supervision intensity [47]. There is regional variation in the degree to which people use online shopping compared to regions that do less so.…”
Section: Loss Of In-person Food Sensory Experience/concern Over Food Substitutions and Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%