2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c00735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality-Driven Autoencoder for Nonlinear Quality-Related and Process-Related Fault Detection Based on Least-Squares Regularization and Enhanced Statistics

Abstract: Although many kernel-based quality-related monitoring methods have been developed for nonlinear processes, the nonlinearity between process variables and quality indicators is not well interpreted by kernel mapping and subsequent regression. To monitor a nonlinear quality-related latent space, a novel framework that consists of quality-related and process-related statistics rather than quality-related and quality-independent statistics is proposed. First, we train a quality-driven autoencoder (QdAE) with least… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After all the process variables are assigned, the input matrix X is divided into two parts: the quality-related part, X sel , and quality-unrelated part, X res X = X sel + X res (11) According to the preliminary part of PLS above, the regression coefficient between the latent variable and the quality variable is…”
Section: The Proposed Mi-plsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After all the process variables are assigned, the input matrix X is divided into two parts: the quality-related part, X sel , and quality-unrelated part, X res X = X sel + X res (11) According to the preliminary part of PLS above, the regression coefficient between the latent variable and the quality variable is…”
Section: The Proposed Mi-plsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the prior knowledge of these faults, there were ten quality-related faults (IDV 1, 2, 5-8, 12, 13, 18, and 21) and eleven faults unrelated to quality (IDV 3,4,(9)(10)(11)14,15,16,17,19 and 20). The prediction result is a suitable way to illustrate the model's accuracy.…”
Section: Tennessee Eastman Process Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variables in this process contain two blocks of variables: the XMV block of 11 manipulated variables and the XMEAS block of 41 measured variables which include 22 process and 19 analysis variables. In this simulation, 22 process variables (XMEAS ) and 11 manipulated variables (XMV (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)) are chosen to be process input X, and select purge gas analysis component G (XMEAS (35)) as the quality output Y.…”
Section: Te Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other process-related fault detection methods have canonical correlation analysis (CCA), 6 non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), 7,8 and so on. Another particularly important research direction for MSPM is quality-related fault diagnosis, [9][10][11] in which qualityrelated fault detection and fault isolation are two key tasks. Quality-related fault detection belongs to a supervised learning task in machine learning area, 12 and it aims to detect whether a fault that affects product quality occurs in the industrial system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%