Quality Control, Robust Design, and the Taguchi Method 1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-1472-1_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Engineering using Design of Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
1,148
0
42

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,089 publications
(1,193 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
1,148
0
42
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Taguchi method, the signalto-noise ratios ( ratio) serve as the objective functions for optimization, help in data analysis, and predict the optimum results (Phadke, 2009). The  ratio is the ratio of the mean to the standard deviation, and is the measure of the deviation of the response (dependent parameter) from the desired value.…”
Section: Identification Of Optimum Levels Of Independent Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Taguchi method, the signalto-noise ratios ( ratio) serve as the objective functions for optimization, help in data analysis, and predict the optimum results (Phadke, 2009). The  ratio is the ratio of the mean to the standard deviation, and is the measure of the deviation of the response (dependent parameter) from the desired value.…”
Section: Identification Of Optimum Levels Of Independent Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L 18 (2 1 ×3 7 ) orthogonal array [46] is used to implement the experiments according to Taguchi's parameter design principles (Figure 3). In Figure 3, columns 2-9 represent the eight mixture dosages (factors) and their levels.…”
Section: Signal To Noise Ratio Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where T is the nominal value of the productivity target specification; y is real field productivity; L is the loss associated to a particular difference between y and T; and k is the quality loss coefficient, whose value depends on the cost at any specified limits and on the width of such specification, e.g., T ± Δ, where Δ is the customer's tolerance to deviation of y from the target (Phadke, 1989). 2.00E+02 0.00E+00 1.16E+00 1.46E+01 0 0 0 y3 2.00E+02 0.00E+00 1.27E+00 1.76E+01 N-P-K: 15-15-15 = 2.50E+02 Paraquat = 3.75E+00 0 y4 3.00E+02 0.00E+00 1.16E+00 0.00E+00 0 Glyphosate = 1.17E+00 0 y5 4.67E+02 3.30E+02 5.80E-01 9.55E+00 0 Glyphosate = 1.20E+01 0 y6…”
Section: Tlf Economic Assessment Of the Cocoa Production Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%